Background Image
Previous Page  21 / 22 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 21 / 22 Next Page
Page Background

The Directive in the context of the European Banking Union

7

visory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Au-

thority)(...)”

,

19

and

• the European Securities and Markets Authority (‘ESMA’) under

Regula-

tion (EU) No 1095/2010

“establishing a European Supervisory Author-

ity (European Securities and Markets Authority)(...)”

.

20

The three Authorities, which are mainly regulatory authorities with some

especially designated supervisory powers, succeeded and replaced the three

Lamfalussy Committees (CEBS, CESR and CEIOPS),

21

thus maintaining the

‘sectoral approach’ with regard to European institutional arrangements con-

cerning the financial system’s micro-prudential supervision.

22

Nevertheless,

financial supervision remained, in principle, national.

EBA plays a very important role in the context of European legislation on

deposit guarantee schemes. Accordingly, it will be examined in more detail

below in Sections B-E of this study, as appropriate.

(ii)

In addition, the European Systemic Risk Board (the ‘ESRB’) was estab-

lished under

Regulation (EU) No 1092/2010

of the European Parliament and

of the Council of 24 November 2010

“on European Union macro-prudential

oversight of the financial system and establishing a European Systemic Risk

Board”.

23

Accordingly, the macro-prudential oversight of the European fi-

nancial system was the

first – and unique until 2014 – component

of the

europeanised ‘bank safety net’ (see below under 2). Each Member State also

designated an authority entrusted with the conduct of macro-prudential

policy in national legislation, as set out in Recommendation B, paragraph

1, of the

Recommendation of the European Systemic Risk Board

of 22 De-

cember 2011

“on the macroprudential mandate of national authorities”

(

ESRB/2011/3

).

24

19. OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, pp. 48-83.

20. OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, pp. 84-119.

21. On these Committees, see indicatively

Lastra (2006)

, pp. 334-341.

22. As regards the reasons that led to this approach being adopted (although there were

proposals for the unification of Authorities), see

Louis (2010)

, p. 154 (point 7.10).

23. OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, pp. 1-11. In connection to the operation of the ESRB specific

tasks have been conferred on the ECB under

Council Regulation (EU) No 1096/2010

of 17 November 2010

“conferring specific tasks upon the European Central Bank

concerning the functioning of the European Systemic Risk Board”

(OJ L 331,

15.12.2010, pp. 162-164).

24. OJ C 41, 14.2.2012, pp. 1-4.