

14
Mandatory rules imposed on shipping and their insurance cost
The IMO’s Ballast Water Management Convention enters into force on 8
September 2017 with two applicable standards for BW exchange and discharge
– D1 and D2:
(i) D1 Standard: applies to ballast water exchange in deepwater, normallymore
than 200 nautical miles from the nearest land in water at least 200 metres
in depth, which should be carried out taking into account the relevant
IMO Guidelines. Prior to the date by when a ship must comply with the D2
standard (see next paragraph), ballast water exchange in accordance with
the BWM Convention’s D1
exchange
standard is acceptable;
(ii) D2 Standard: applies to discharge of ballast water using a type-approved
ballast water management system on board the ship. In accordance
with the BWM Convention, the D2
discharge
standard must be complied
with by the time of the first International Oil Pollution Prevention (IOPP)
Certificate renewal, which is conducted at least once every five years for
each ship (as required under MARPOL Annex 1).
There are separate requirements for new build ships, with compliance
depending on the date upon which the keel was laid. The exact position is still
not clear, but now that the date of entry into force of the BWM Convention is
known, we can expect further clarification on compliance in due course.
What is the insurance cost of ensuring compliance with BWM regulations?. It
is the risk of fines being imposed for non-compliance. The difficulty is that at
present (a) nobody is certain of the level of fines that may be imposed, which
will depend on the country, and (b) there is currently no single form of ballast
water treatment system that will be accepted throughout the world. So,
for instance, although there are currently about 60 types of equipment that
carry an IMO type approval, such approval does not satisfy US requirements
because the US is not a party to the BWM Convention, with the United States
Coast Guard (“USCG”) having issued its own regulations with regard to the
treatment of ballast water.
The USCG regulations contain their own timeline for USCG acceptance of
approved ballast water treatment systems in the future though this has been
extended because, as at this date of this presentation (13 October 2016),
there are no USCG approved ballast water treatment systems available.
5
A further complication in the US is that, in addition to the USCG regulations,
the US Clean Water
Act (CWA) authorises the United States Environmental
5. Since this presentation was given on 13 October 2016, the USCG has approved three
ballast water treatment systems. See
https://www.britanniapandi.com/news/us-coast-guard-approves-new-bwms/