Η ΑΞΙΩΣΗ ΑΔΙΚΑΙΟΛΟΓΗΤΟΥ ΠΛΟΥΤΙΣΜΟΥ ΣΤΟ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟ ΚΑΙ ΣΤΟ ΑΓΓΛΙΚΟ ΔΙΚΑΙΟ

18 / 38

ŎŐňŎŇńŒņőņ ŁōňŸőņő Ł¨ňʼnŁňŎŊŎŃņŒŎœ ŏŊŎœŒňőŋŎœ őŒŎ ńŊŊņŌňʼnŎ & őŒŎ ŁŃŃŊňʼnŎ ¨ňʼnŁňŎ
37
ŬŜŮůŤŧŢ ›ŬŷŮűŞůŞ184, šŦŞ›ŦŮůŹũūũůŞŦ ޛŦŧŞŨŸųŢŦŭ —Ţ řŨŨŞ ›ŢšŜŞ ůūŰ šŦ-
ŧŞŜūŰ. œ›řŬŲūŰũ ޛŜŮŤŭ, ŨŷŠūŦ ›ūŰ ŮŲŢůŜţūũůŞŦ —Ţ ůŤũ Ş—űŜşūŨŤ Ş›ūůŢ-
ŨŢٗŞůŦŧŷůŤůŞ ›ūŰ ŚŲŢŦ Ť ũū—ūťŢŮŜŞ Ůůū common law, ŧŞťŹŭ űŞŜũŢůŞŦ
ŷůŦ ťŚůŢŦ ŮŢ ŧŜũšŰũū ůŤũ ůŢŲũŦŧś ůŤŭ ŢŰŚŨŦŧůŤŭ ޛŦŨūŠśŭ šŦŧŞŜūŰ ŧŞŦ ůŤŭ
Şũř›ůŰŪŤŭ —ŚŮŴ ůŤŭ ޗ›ŢŦŬŜŞŭ ŠŦŞ ůūũ ůŬŷ›ū ŨŢŦůūŰŬŠŜŞŭ —ŦŞŭ ŞŬŲśŭ185.
Ŏ ŨŷŬšūŭ Reid ŮŢ ū—ŦŨŜŞ ůūŰ ŞũŚűŢŬŢ186: «Łũ ŮŧŚűůŢŮůŢ —Ţ ›Ŭūū›ůŦŧś
—ŤũŹũ, ŞũŞţŤůŢŜůŢ —ŦŞ ŮůŦŠ—ŦŞŜŞ ŨŸŮŤ ŮůŞ ›ŬūşŨś—Şůř ŮŞŭ ŧŞŦ šŢũ ŮŞŭ
ŢũšŦŞűŚŬŢŦ Ţřũ ťŞ ›ŬūŮŞŬ—ūŮůŢŜ ūŬťŹŭ, ŮůūŲŢŸŮůŢ ŮůŤ ũū—ūťŢŮŜŞ. Łũ
ŮŧŚűůŢŮůŢ —Ţ ›Ŭūū›ůŦŧś šŢŧŞŢůŦŹũ, ›ŬūůŦ—řůŢ ůŤ —ŢťūšŦŧś Şũř›ůŰŪŤ
ŧŞŦ ›ŦŮůŢŸŢůŢ ŮůŤũ ›ŞŨŦř ›ŞŬūŦ—ŜŞ «›ŢŬŦŮŮŷůŢŬŤ ٛūŰšś, ŨŦŠŷůŢŬŤ ůŞ-
ŲŸůŤůŞ», ůŷůŢ ›ŞŬŞ—ŢŜũŞůŢ ›ŦŮůūŜ Ůůū common law». ŋŦŞ Şŧŷ—Ş ŧŬŦůŦŧś
ŠŦŞ ůŤ ũū—ūťŢŮŜŞ Ş›ūůŢŨŢŜ Ť ůřŮŤ ůŴũ ŮŸŠŲŬūũŴũ ũū—ūťŢůŦŧŹũ šŦŞůř-
ŪŢŴũ Ůůū ›ŢšŜū ůūŰ ŦšŦŴůŦŧūŸ šŦŧŞŜūŰ ũŞ —Ť šŜšūŰũ ŨŸŮŢŦŭ ŮůŞ šŸŮŧūŨŞ
ţŤůś—ŞůŞ, šŦŞůۛŹũūũůŞŭ ŢŰŬŢŜŢŭ ŧŞŦ ŠŢũŦŧŚŭ ŞŬŲŚŭ.
3. ¨ŦŞ›ŦŮůŹũŢůŞŦ ›ŢŬŞŦůŚŬŴ, ŷůŦ Ť ŚŨŨŢŦųŤ ũū—ūťŢůŦŧśŭ ›ŬŷşŨŢųŤŭ ŧŞŦ
ŬŸť—ŦŮŤŭ Ş›ŷ ůū ŞŠŠŨŦŧŷ šŜŧŞŦū ůūŰ ŞšŦŧŞŦūŨŷŠŤůūŰ ›ŨūŰůŦٗūŸ šŤ—Ŧ-
ūŰŬŠŢŜ ›ŬūşŨś—ŞůŞ, ŧŞťŹŭ ŞũŞŧŸ›ůŢŦ Ť ŞũřŠŧŤ ŢŦšŦŧśŭ ũū—Ŧŧśŭ ťŢ—ŢŨŜ-
ŴŮŤŭ ůŤŭ ŞŪŜŴŮŤŭ187. ŎŦ ťŢŴŬŤůŦŧūŜ ůūŰ šŦŧŞŜūŰ188 ŮůŤũ ›ŬūٛřťŢŦř ůūŰŭ
184. J. Dawson, Unjust Enrichment, 1951, 39-40.
185. J. Stone, Precedent and Law, 1985, 31, P. Atiyah, Common Law and Statute Law,
1985, 48 MLR, 1.
186. “If you think in months, want an instant solution for your problems and do not
mind that it will not wear well, then go for legislation. if you think in decades,
prefer orderly, growth and believe in the old proverb “more haste less speed”,
then stick to the common law”, 1972, J.S.P.T.L. 22, 28.
187. Ŋ. ŕŬűŭŨŧźŰť, ņ condictio indebiti, 5, M. ŒŰşŦŸ›ŬűũŬű, ńŦšŦŧŷ ńũūŲŦŦŧŷ ¨ŜŧŞŦū,
17 ޛ.
188. K. Barker, Unjust Enrichment: Containing the Beast, 1995, 15 OJLS, 457-475, ŰŬű
ŧŢŝŬű, Understanding the Unjust Enrhichment Principle in Private Law: a study
of the concept and its reasons ŮŢ: J. Neyers-M. McInnes-S. Pitel, Oxford Hart
Publishing, 2004, 79-110, ŰŬű ŧŢŝŬű, Theorising Unjust Enrichment Law-Being
realist(ic)?, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 26, No. 3, 2006, 609-626, A.
Botterel, Property, Corrective Justice, and the Nature of the Cause of Action in
Unjust Enrichment, 2007, 20 Can J L& Juris 275-295, A. Drassinower, Unrequested
BeneÀts in the Law of Unjust Enrichment, 1998, 48 U Toronto LJ, 459-488, T.
Hang Wu, Natural obligations and the common law of Unjust Enrichment, Oxford
University Commonwealth Law Journal, 2006, 133-156, D. Klimchuk , Unjust
Enrichment and Corrective Justice: J. Neyers, M. McInnes and St. Pitel (n 4) 111-
137, The Structure and Content of the Right to Restitution for Unjust Enrichment,
2007, 57 U Toronto L J 661-684, A. Kull, Restitution’s Outlaws, Chicago-Kent
Law Review, Vol. 78, 2003, 17-32, J. Nadler, What right does Unjust Enrichment
Law protect?, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 28, No.2, 2008, 245-275, C.
Rotherham, Unjust Enrichment and the Autonomy of Law: Private Law as Public