Η ΑΞΙΩΣΗ ΑΔΙΚΑΙΟΛΟΓΗΤΟΥ ΠΛΟΥΤΙΣΜΟΥ ΣΤΟ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟ ΚΑΙ ΣΤΟ ΑΓΓΛΙΚΟ ΔΙΚΑΙΟ

32 / 38

ŎŐňŎŇńŒņőņ ŁōňŸőņő Ł¨ňʼnŁňŎŊŎŃņŒŎœ ŏŊŎœŒňőŋŎœ őŒŎ ńŊŊņŌňʼnŎ & őŒŎ ŁŃŃŊňʼnŎ ¨ňʼnŁňŎ
51
ŮŤŭ ›ŬŚ›ŢŦ ũŞ šŦŞšŬŞ—ŞůŜŮŢŦ ŚũŞ ŬŷŨū ŮůŤ šŦŚũŢŪŤ —ŢůŞŪŸ ůŴũ —ŢŬŹũ»249.
ʼnŬŜŮŦ—ū ŢŜũŞŦ šŤŨŞšś, ŧŞůř ›ŷŮūũ ū ›ŨūŰůŦٗŷŭ —ŢůŞűŚŬŢůŞŦ ŮŢ ŞŧūŨūŰ-
ťŜŞ ś Ůůū ›ŨŞŜŮŦū —ŦŞŭ ŮŸ—şŞŮŤŭ: «ńŜũŞŦ şŞŮŦŧŷ šŷŠ—Ş ůūŰ šŦŧŞŜūŰ ůŤŭ
Ş›ūŧŞůřŮůŞŮŤŭ ŷůŦ šŢũ —›ūŬŢŜ ũŞ Ş›ūšūťŢŜ Ş›ūŧŞůřŮůŞŮŤ ŠŦŞ Ţŧ›ŨśŬŴ-
ŮŤ —ŦŞŭ ŚŠŧŰŬŤŭ ۛūŲŬŚŴŮŤŭ ›ūŰ ūűŢŜŨŢůŞŦ Ůůū Ũś›ůŤ. ņ ›ŬŷůŞŮŤ űŞŜ-
ũŢůŞŦ ŞŰůŞ›ŷšŢŦŧůŤ»250. «Ľ›ūŰ ŚũŞ ŧŚŬšūŭ ŚŲŢŦ Ş›ūũޗŤťŢŜ şřŮŢŦ —ŦŞŭ
šŢٗŢŰůŦŧśŭ ŮŸ—şŞŮŤŭ, Ş›ŷ ůŤũ ū›ūŜŞ šŢũ —›ūŬūŸũ ũŞ Ű›ŞũŞŲŴŬśŮūŰũ
ůŞ —ŚŨŤ, ū ŢũřŠŴũ ›ŬŚ›ŢŦ ũŞ ŞũŞţŤůśŮŢŦ ůū ŚũšŦŧū şūśťŤ—Ş şřŮŢŦ ůŤŭ
ŮŸ—şŞŮŤŭ ŧŞŦ ŷŲŦ şřŮŢŦ ůŤŭ Ş›ūŧŞůřŮůŞŮŤŭ»251. ņ ›ūŦŧŦŨŜŞ ŮŢ ŞŰůŚŭ ůŦŭ
šŦŞůۛŹŮŢŦŭ šŤ—ŦūŰŬŠŢŜ Ş—űŦşūŨŜŞ ŠŦŞ ůū ŧŞůř ›ŷŮūũ ŧř›ūŦūŭ Ş›ŷ ŞŰ-
ůūŸŭ ůūŰŭ ŦŮŲŰŬŦٗūŸŭ ŢŜũŞŦ ŢŰŬŸůŢŬŞ Ş›ūšŢŧůŷŭ252.
Ŏ ŢũřŠŴũ —›ūŬŢŜ ũŞ Ű›ūŮůŤŬŜŪŢŦ ŷůŦ Ť ŮŸ—şŞŮŤ ŚŲŢŦ ›řųŢŦ ũŞ ŢŜũŞŦ ŮŢ
ŦŮŲŸ, ŷůŞũ ŞŰůś šŢũ ŧŞůŞŬůŜŮůŤŧŢ ›ūůŚ ś śůŞũ ŠŦŞ ŧř›ūŦū ũū—Ŧŧŷ ŨŷŠū
ŢŪŞŬŲśŭ řŧŰŬŤ, ›ŞŬŞşŦřŮůŤŧŢ Ş›ŷ ůū ŚũŞ —ŚŬūŭ ŧŞŦ ůū řŨŨū —ŚŬūŭ ۛŞ-
ũŞŲŹŬŤŮŢ, ŞŧŰŬŹťŤŧŢ253 ś ŷůŦ ū ŢũŞŠŷ—Ţũūŭ šŢũ ŢŜũŞŦ ŚůūŦ—ūŭ, ŦŧŞũŷŭ ś
›ŬŷťŰ—ūŭ ŠŦŞ ůŤũ Ţŧ›ŨśŬŴŮś ůŤŭ254.
ĺŲŢŦ ŷ—Ŵŭ šŦŞůۛŴťŢŜ ŧŞŦ Ť ›Ŧū ŮůŢũś ŚũũūŦŞ Ţ›ŦŧūŰŬŦŧŷůŤůŞŭ, ŮŸ—űŴũŞ
—Ţ ůŤũ ū›ūŜŞ, Ş›ŞŦůŢŜůŞŦ Ş›ŷ ůū šŦŧŞŮůśŬŦū ũŞ ›ŬūŮšŦūŬŜŮŢŦ ŧŞůř ›ŷŮūũ
Ť ŮŰŠŧŢŧŬŦ—ŚũŤ —ŢůŞűūŬř ŞűūŬūŸŮŢ ŧŞůŞũޗŤ—Śũū Ş›ŷ ůŤ ŮŸ—şŞŮŤ ŧŜũ-
šŰũū255, ŧŞůř ›ŷŮūũ ŧŞŨŸ›ůŢůŞŦ šŤŨŞšś Ş›ŷ ůū ›ŢŬŦŢŲŷ—Ţũū ůŤŭ ŮŸ—şŞ-
249. G. Virgo, The Principles of the Law of Restitution, 2nd edition, Oxford University
Press, Oxford 2006, 40.
250. D. Friedmann, Valid, voidable, qualiÀed, and non existing obligations: an
alternative perspective on the law of restitution, ŮŢ: Burrows (ed.), Essays on
the Law of Restitution (n.4), 247-8.
251. R. Goff and G. Jones: the Law of Restitution (Sweet and Maxwell, London 1966)
21.
252. G. Virgo, Failure of Consideration: myth and meaning in the English Law of
Restitution ŮŢ: Johnston-Zimmermann (eds), UnjustiÀed Enrichment: Key Issues
in Comparative Perspective, 2002, 109, St. Waddams, The relation between
Contract and Unjust Enrichment ŮŢ P. Giliker, Re-examining Contract and Unjust
Enrichment: anglo-canadian perspectives, Martimus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden-
Boston, 2007, 17.
253. Fibrosa Spolka Akcujna v. Fairbairn Lawson Combe Barbour Ltd 1943, AC 32.
254. Thomas v. Brown (1876) 1 QB 714.
255. J. Beatson, The temptation of elegance: concurrence of restitutionary and
contractual claims ŮŢ: W. Swadling - G. Jones (eds), The search for principle: Essays
in Honour of Lord Goff of Chieveley, Oxford University Press, 1999, 153-154,, ŰŬű
ŧŢŝŬű, Resitution and Contract: Non-Cumul?, 2000, 1 Theoritical Inquiries in Law,
94-96, P. Birks, Failure of Consideration nad its place on the map, 2002, 2 Oxford