Η ΔΙΚΑΙΟΔΟΤΙΚΗ ΛΕΙΤΟΥΡΓΙΑ ΣΤΟ ΔΙΕΘΝΕΣ ΔΙΚΑΙΟ

19 / 24

±¯ š¦§¡¦¯ ž¯² š¦£ž£¦ ±¥® ¡Ÿ§¥Ÿ¥ ±¥Ÿ š¦§¡¦¯š¯±¦§¥Ÿ œ£¦±¯²°™¦¡Ÿ
101
ÅÊÅÒÁÑÓÎÀÍ ÌÎɍ¾Í ÒÁ ÓŌ»ÌÉÁ ÒÎ× ÄÉÅÓÍÎÀÕ ÄÉËÁÉÎÄÎÒÉËÎÀ ÄÉËÁÉÎ× (§1), ËÁÓÏÕ ËÁÉ
ÎÉ ÅÉŒ»ÐÎ×Õ ÅÇÇ×¼ÑÅÉÕ Î× Ñ×ÍÓ»ÒÎ×Í ÒÈÍ »ÍÍÎÉÁ ÒÈÕ Ä½ËÁÉÈÕ Ä½ËÈÕ ÑÒÎ ÄÉÅÓÍ»Õ Å-
ĽΠ(§2).
§1. ±Î ÄÉÅÓÍ»Õ ÄÉËÁÉÎÄÎÒÉ˾ ĽËÁÉÎ ÓŌ»ÌÉÎ ÒÈÕ ÄÉËÁÉÎÄÎÒÉË¼Õ ÌÅÉ-
ÒÎ×ÐǽÁÕ
¯É ÈÇ»Õ ÒÎ× ÄÉÅÓÍÎÀÕ ÄÉËÁÉÎÄÎÒÉËÎÀ ÄÉËÁ½Î× Å½ÍÁÉ ÎÉ ÈÇ»Õ ÒÎ× Î×ÑÉÁÑÒÉËÎÀ ÄÉ-
ÅÓÍÎÀÕ ÄÉËÁ½Î×, ¾ÔÕ ËÁÒÁÇÐÆÎÍÒÁÉ ÑÒÎ ÐÓÐÎ 38 ÒÎ× §ÁÒÁÑÒÁÒÉËÎÀ ÒÎ× šÉÅÓÍÎÀÕ
šÉËÁÑÒÈнÎ× ÒÔÍ ¥£16. £ÊÌÌÎ×, ÒÁ ÄÉÅÓͼ ÄÉËÁÉÎÄÎÒÉ˾ÐÇÁÍÁ ōÉËÁÌÎÀÍÒÁÉ Ñ×ÖÍ
ÅÇÇÅÍÅ½Õ ÅÊÎ×ѽÅÕ (inherent powers), ÑÀŒÆ×ÒÅÕ ÑÒÈ ÄÉËÁÉÎÄÎÒÉ˼ ÌÅÉÒÎ×ÐǽÁ ËÁÉ ÁÁ-
ÐÁ½ÒÈÒÅÕ ÇÉÁ ÒÈÍ ÎÐÓ¼ ÑËÈѼ ÒÈÕ.
¡. ¯É ÎÌÌÁÌ»Õ ÈÇ»Õ ÒÎ× ÄÉÅÓÍÎÀÕ ÄÉËÁÉÎÄÎÒÉËÎÀ ÄÉËÁ½Î×
¡ÍÁÆÅоŒÅÍÎÕ ÑÒÈÍ ÐλÌÅ×ÑÈ ÒÔÍ ËÁ;ÍÔÍ Î× ÄÉ»Î×Í ÒÈ ÄÉËÁÉÎÄÎÒÉ˼ ÌÅÉ-
ÒÎ×ÐǽÁ, Î S. Rosenne ÁÐÁÒÈÐŽ ¾ÒÉ:
“In international law, these nominally have a conventional origin. They have grown out
of the law and practice of international arbitration, and in the course of the history of that
institution much customary law has been generated by some and some underlying principles
have emerged from the practice of States and the accumulation of arbitral awards following
a fairly consistent pattern. In judicial proceedings before the International Court, the varia-
ble factors characteristic of arbitration...become constants, and the procedural aspects are
more closely regulated by the constituent or basic instrument. This constancy, in its turn,
has facilitated the development of procedural law...which is now an autonomous branch of
international law”17.
S. Rosenne, Law and Practice of the International Court of Justice, ¾. ÁÐ., ÑÅÌ. 1021-
1052, ÉĽÔÕ ÑÅÌ. 1028. ™ÉÁ ŒÉÁ Ð¾ÑÆÁÒÈ ŒÅÌ»ÒÈ, C. Brown, A Common Law of International
Adjudication , ¾. ÁÐ. ¢Ì. ËÁÉ ÒÈ Ñ׌ÂÎ̼ ÒÔÍ H. Ruiz Fabri & J.-M. Sorel, “L’exportation du
modèle universel vers les juridictions internationales”, ÑÒÎ: S. Guinchard et als., Droit proces-
suel. Droits fondamentaux du procès, 6ème éd., Paris, Dalloz, 2011, ÑÅÌ. 1117-1199, ¾Î×
ÎÉ Ñ×ÇÇÐÁÆÅ½Õ ŒÉÌÎÀÍ ÇÉÁ, ËÁÒ’ÁÐÖ¼Í, ÁÎ×ѽÁ ÄÉËÎÍΌÉË¼Õ Ñ×ÍÎÖ¼Õ (‘absence d’unité en
matière processuelle’, ÑÅÌ. 1123), ōÉÑȌÁ½ÍÎÍÒÁÕ ÔÑÒ¾ÑÎ ¾ÒÉ ÒÎÀÒÎ ÄÅÍ Á½ÐÅÉ ÒÈÍ ÀÁÐÊÈ Ñ×-
ÇË̽ÑÅÔÍ ËÁÉ ËÎÉÍÏÍ ÁÐÖÏÍ Î× ÄÉ»Î×Í ÒÈÍ ÑËÈÑÈ ÒÈÕ ÄÉÅÓÍÎÀÕ ÄÉËÁÉÎÄÎÒÉË¼Õ ÌÅÉÒÎ×ÐǽÁÕ
(ibid.). £½ÑÈÕ, R. Plender, “Rules of Procedure in the International Court and the European
Court”, 2 EJIL, 1991, ÑÅÌ. 1-30, ËÁÉ ÉĽÔÕ ÒÉÕ ÁÐÁÒÈмÑÅÉÕ ÒÎ× Ñ×ÇÇÐÁÆ»Á ¾ÒÉ ÎÉ ËÁ;ÍÅÕ ÄÉÁ-
ÄÉËÁѽÁÕ ÒÎ× šÉËÁÑÒÈнÎ× ÒÔÍ £×ÐԍÁïËÏÍ §ÎÉÍÎÒ¼ÒÔÍ ÅÈÐÅÑÓÈËÁÍ ÑÅ ŒÅÇÌÎ ÂÁӌ¾ Á¾
ÒÎ×Õ ÁÍÒ½ÑÒÎÉÖÎ×Õ ËÁ;ÍÅÕ ÒÎ× šÉÅÓÍÎÀÕ šÉËÁÑÒÈнÎ× ÒÔÍ ¥£.
16. Ibid., ÉĽÔÕ ÑÅÌ. 405ō., V. Coussirat-Coustère & P.-M. Eisemann, “La procédure devant les
juridictions internationales permanentes”, ÑÒÎ: La juridiction internationale permanente,
Paris, Pedone, 1987, ÑÅÌ. 103-165, ÑÅÌ. 108ō., C. Brown, A Common Law of International
Adjudication , ¾. ÁÐ., ÑÅÌ. 36ō.
17. The Law and Practice of the International Court of Justice 1920-2005, Vol. III, ¾. ÁÐ., ÑÅÌ.
1028. ™ÉÁ ÒÈ ÑÒÁÄÉÁ˼ ÁÍÄ×ÑÈ ÁÐÖÏÍ ËÁÉ ËÁ;ÍÔÍ Åн ÎÐÓ¼Õ ÁÎÍΌ¼Õ ÄÉËÁÉÎÑÀÍÈÕ ÑÒÎ
ÄÉÅÓÍ»Õ Ä½ËÁÉÎ, ÂÌ. A. Lelarge, “L’émergence d’un principe de bonne administration de la jus-