Η ΔΙΚΑΙΟΔΟΤΙΚΗ ΛΕΙΤΟΥΡΓΙΑ ΣΤΟ ΔΙΕΘΝΕΣ ΔΙΚΑΙΟ

23 / 24

±¯ š¦§¡¦¯ ž¯² š¦£ž£¦ ±¥® ¡Ÿ§¥Ÿ¥ ±¥Ÿ š¦§¡¦¯š¯±¦§¥Ÿ œ£¦±¯²°™¦¡Ÿ
105
Œ»ÑÁ ÑÒÁ ¾ÐÉÁ ÒÎ× Dispute Settlement Understanding, ËÁÉ ×¾ ÒÎÍ »ÌÅÇÖÎ ÒÎ×
£ÆÅÒÅÉÁËÎÀ ŸÏŒÁÒÎÕ, ÒΠ΍νΠ»ÖÅÉ ÒÈÍ ÁЌÎÄɾÒÈÒÁ ÍÁ ÅÌ»ÇÖÅÉ ÒÎ×Õ ËÁ;ÍÅÕ ÄÉÁÄÉ-
ËÁѽÁÕ Î× ×ÉÎÓÅÒÎÀÍ ÒÁ žÍÅÌ ÑÒÈÍ ÅËĽËÁÑÈ ŒÉÁÕ ×¾ÓÅÑÈÕ. ±Î £ÆÅÒÅÉÁ˾ ŸÏŒÁ
ÄÅÍ ÄÉÁÓ»ÒÅÉ Å×ÐŽÁ ÁЌÎÄɾÒÈÒÁ ÄÉÁŒ¾ÐÆÔÑÈÕ ËÁ;ÍÔÍ ÄÉÁÄÉËÁѽÁÕ ÁÍÒ½ÑÒÎÉÖÈ ŒÅ
ÌÌÁ ÄÉËÁÉÎÄÎÒÉ˾ÐÇÁÍÁ, ËÁÒ ÒÎ Œ»ÒÐÎ Î× ÎÉ ËÁ;ÍÅÕ ÄÉÁÄÉËÁѽÁÕ ×ÉÎÓÅÒÎÀÍÒÁÉ
ÑÅ Ñ×ÍÅÍ;ÈÑÈ ŒÅ ÒÎÍ Chairman ËÁÉ ÒÎÍ Director-General.
žÍÒÔÕ, ÄÅÍ ÁÎ×ÑÉØÅÉ ÍÒÎÒÅ ËÁÉ È Ä×ÍÁÒ¾ÒÈÒÁ ÒÔÍ ŒÅÐÏÍ ÍÁ ÁÐŌÂÁ½-
ÍÎ×Í ÑÒÎ×Õ ËÁ;ÍÅÕ ÄÉËÎÍΌ½ÁÕ: ÑÒÎ šÉÅÓÍ»Õ šÉËÁÑÒ¼ÐÉÎ, ÑÒÎ šÉËÁÑÒ¼ÐÉÎ šÉËÁ½Î×
›ÌÁÑÑÁÕ ËÁÓÏÕ ËÁÉ ÑÒÈ ÄÉÁÉÒÈѽÁ ICSID, ÒÁ ÄÉÄÉËÁ Œ»ÐÈ »ÖÎ×Í ÒÈ Ä×ÍÁÒ¾ÒÈÒÁ ÍÁ
ÐÎÒŽÍÎ×Í, Á¾ ËÎÉÍÎÀ, ÐÎÕ ÒÎ ÄÉËÁÉÎÄÎÒÉ˾ ¾ÐÇÁÍÎ, ÒÐ΍΍ÎɼÑÅÉÕ ÒÔÍ ËÁ;ÍÔÍ
ÄÉÁÄÉËÁѽÁÕ ËÁÒ ÒÈÍ ÅËĽËÁÑÈ Ñ×ÇËÅËÐɌ»ÍÈÕ ×ÎÓ»ÑÅÔÕ, ËÁÉ ŒÅ ÒÈ Ä×ÍÁÒ¾ÒÈÒÁ Á×-
Ò¼ «ÅÁÍŌÆÁͽØÅÒÁÉ» ŒÉÁ -ÅÐÉÎÐÉь»ÍÈ Â»ÂÁÉÁ- ÄÉÁËÐÉÒÉ˼ Å×Ö»ÐÅÉÁ ÒÔÍ ŒÅÐÏÍ Å½
ÒÈÕ ÄÉÁÄÉËÁѽÁÕ31.
¥ Ä×ÍÁÒ¾ÒÈÒÁ Î× ÁлÖÅÒÁÉ ÑÒÁ ÄÉËÁÉÎÄÎÒÉË ¾ÐÇÁÍÁ Á¾ ÒÉÕ ËÁÒÁÑÒÁÒÉË»Õ ÄÉ-
ÁÒÊÅÉÕ ÍÁ ÄÉÁŒÎÐÆÏÍÎ×Í ¼/ËÁÉ ÍÁ Ñ׌ÌÈÐÏÍÎ×Í ÒÎ×Õ ËÁ;ÍÅÕ ÄÉÁÄÉËÁѽÁÕ ÁƼ-
ÍÎ×Í ÅÐÉÓÏÐÉÁ ÄÉËÁÉ΍ÌÁÑÒÉË¼Õ Á×ÒÎÍΌ½ÁÕ ÒÎ× ÄÉËÁÑÒ¼ ÔÕ ÐÎÕ ÒÎ×Õ ÄÉËÎÍΌÉ-
ËÎÀÕ ËÁ;ÍÅÕ, ¼, «ÅÎÉËÎÄΌÈÒÉË¼Õ ÅЌÈÍŽÁÕ» ÒÔÍ ËÁ;ÍÔÍ Á×ÒÏÍ32.
¢. ¯É ÅÇÇÅÍÅ½Õ ÅÊÎ×ѽÅÕ ÒÔÍ ÄÉÅÓÍÏÍ ÄÉËÁÉÎÄÎÒÉËÏÍ ÎÐÇÍÔÍ
(Inherent Powers)
£ÊÌÌÎ×, ËÁÒ ÒÈÍ ÑËÈÑÈ ÒÈÕ ÌÅÉÒÎ×ÐǽÁÕ ÒÎ×Õ, ÒÁ ÄÉÅÓͼ ÄÉËÁÉÎÄÎÒÉË ¾ÐÇÁ-
ÍÁ Ñ×ÖÍ ÅÉËÁÌÎÀÍÒÁÉ ÅÇÇÅÍÅ½Õ ÅÊÎ×ѽÅÕ (inherent powers)33. žÐnjÁÒÉ, ōÉÂÅÂÁÉÏ-
ÍÅÒÁÉ Ñ×ÖÍ Ò¾ÑÎ ÑÒÈ ÓÅÔнÁ, ¾ÑÎ ËÁÉ ÑÒÈ ÄÉÅÓͼ ÍΌÎÌÎǽÁ, ¾ÒÉ ÒÁ ÄÉËÁÉÎÄÎÒÉË
¾ÐÇÁÍÁ ÄÉÁÓ»ÒÎ×Í ÎÐÉь»ÍÅÕ ÅÊÎ×ѽÅÕ Ñ×Í×ÆÁь»ÍÅÕ ŒÅ ÒÈÍ ½ÄÉÁ ÒÈ ÆÀÑÈ ÒÈÕ ÄÉËÁÉ-
ÎÄÎÒÉË¼Õ ÌÅÉÒÎ×ÐǽÁÕ, ÒÎ ÅÐÉÅÖ¾ŒÅÍÎ ÒÔÍ ÎÎ½ÔÍ ÄÅÍ ÅÄÐØÅÒÁÉ ÁÁÐÁ½ÒÈÒÁ ÑÅ ÐÈÒ¼
Ð¾ÂÌÅÃÈ, ÁÍ ËÁÉ È ÑËÈѼ ÒÎ×Õ ÎÐÉÎÓÅÒŽÒÁÉ Á¾ ÒÈÍ ËÁÒÁÑÒÁÒÉ˼ ÐÊÈ34. ¥ ÁÐ-
31. ´. 101 ÒÔÍ §Á;ÍÔÍ ÄÉÁÄÉËÁѽÁÕ ÒÎ× šÉÅÓÍÎÀÕ šÉËÁÑÒÈнÎ× ÒÔÍ ¥£, . 48 ÒÔÍ §Á;ÍÔÍ ÒÎ×
šÉËÁÑÒÈнÎ× šÉËÁ½Î× ›ÌÁÑÑÁÕ, . 44 ŸÀŒÂÁÑÈÕ ICSID.
32. §ÁÒ ÒÈÍ »ËÆÐÁÑÈ ÒÎ× H. Thirlway (‘constructive interpretation’), “The ICJ 1989-2009: At the
Heart of the Dispute Settlement System?” LJIL, 2010, ÑÅÌ. 347-395, Ñ. 380.
33. ¡¾ ÒÈ ÓÅÔнÁ, ÂÌ. C. Brown, “The Inherent Powers of International Courts and Tribunals”,
76 BYIL, 2005, ÑÅÌ. 195-244, ÒÎ× ÉĽÎ×, “Inherent Powers in International Adjudication”,
ÑÒÎ: The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication, ¾. ÁÐ., ÑÅÌ. 828-847, P. Gaeta,
“The Inherent Powers of International Courts and Tribunals”, ÑÒÎ: L. C. Vohrar et al. (eds.),
Man’s Inhumanity to Man: Essays on International Law in Honour of Antonio Cassese,
Netherlands, Kluwer Law International, 2003, ÑÅÌ. 353-372, I. Van Damme, Inherent Powers
of and for the WTO Appellate Body, The Graduate Institute of Geneva/CTEI Working Paper
102, August 2008, ÄÉÁÓ»ÑɌΠÑÒÎ: ], M. Paparinskis,
“Inherent Powers of ICSID Tribunals: Broad and Rightly So”, ÑÒÎ: T. Weiler & I. Laird (eds.),
Investment Treaty Arbitration and International Law, New York: JurisNet, 2011, ÄÉÁÓ»ÑɌÎ
ÑÒÎ: 1876705].
34. ¢Ì. R. Kolb, “Le maxime de la ‘bonne administration de la justice’ dans la jurisprudence inter-
nationale”, 27 L’Observateur des Nations Unies, 2009/2, ÑÅÌ. 5-21, ÑÅÌ. 7.