

127
§£©¡¡¦¯ IV
£°¨¥®£¦¡ ±¬® ²®¥§¬®
– P. Merkouris, Article 31(3)(c) VCLT and the Principle of Systemic Integration:
Normative
Shadows in Plato’s Cave, Leiden 2015. - A. Aust: Modern Treaty Law and Practice, ¾.. Lord
Mc Nair, The Law of Treaties,¾.., 364. –
Sir I. Sinclair:
The Vienna Convention, ¾.., 114.
–
P. Reuter:
Introduction to the Law of Treaties, ¾.., 73. –
Ch. Rousseau:
Droit International
public (I), 241. –
¦. Brownlie:
Principles of Public International Law, 2003, 602. –
N. Politis:
«Méthodes d’interprétation du droit conventionnel», Mélanges F.Geny, 1935, 374. –
Ch. de
Visscher:
Problèmes d’interprétation judiciaire en droit international public, Paris 1963. –
R.
Bernhardt:
Die Auslegung völkerrechtlicher Verträge, Köln 1963. –
±Î× Á×ÒÎÀ:
«Evolutive Treaty
Interpretation, Especially of the European Convention of Human Rights», German Y.B.I.L.
1999, 11. –
K. Yasseen:
L’interprétation des traités d’après la Convention de Vienne sur le droit
des traités, R.C.A.D.I. 1976 (III). –
M. Mc Dougal, H. Lasswell, J. Miller:
The Interpretation of
Agreements and World Order, New Haven 1967. –
Sir H. Lauterpacht:
«De l’interprétation des
traités», Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International 1950, 1952. –
Sir G. Fitzmaurice:
«The
Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice: Treaty Interpretation», B.Y.B.I.L.
1951, 28. –
D. Simon:
L’interprétation judiciaire des traités d’organisation internationale,
Paris 1981. –
S. Sur:
L’interprétation en droit international public, Paris 1971. –
Sh. Rosenne:
«Conceptualism as a Guide to Treaty Interpretation», Mélanges R.Ago (I), 417. –
F. Capotorti:
«Sul valore délla prassi applicativa dei trattati seconda la Convenzione di Vienna», Mélanges
R.Ago (I), 197. –
M. Tabory:
Multilinguanism in International Law and Institutions, Alphen
1980. –
§. §ÎÀÆÁ:
¥ ÌÅÉÒÎ×ÐǽÁ ÒÔÍ ÐÊÅÔÍ Ë×ÂÅÐͼÑÅÔÕ ÑÒÉÕ ÄÉÅÓÍÅ½Õ ÑÖ»ÑÅÉÕ, ÅÑÑÁÌÎͽËÈ
1983-1985. –
M. Halberstam:
«A Treaty Is a Treaty Is a Treaty», Virginia I.I.I 1992, 51. – Ch.
Tietje: The Changing Legal Structure of International Treaties as an Aspect of an Emerging
Global Governance Architecture», German YBIL, 1999, 26.
– H. Schermers:
«International
Organizations and the Law of Treaties», ¾., 1999, 56. - M. Fitzmaurice, O. Elias, P. Merkouris
(eds.), Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years On
(Leiden, 2010). –
A. Gourgourinis:
“The Distinction Between Interpretation and Application of
Norms in International Adjudication”, J. Int. Dispute Settlement, 2011, 35.
¥ ÅÆÁÐÎǼ ÅÍ¾Õ ËÅÉ»ÍÎ× ÄÅÍ Å½ÍÁÉ Ä×ÍÁÒ¼ ÖÔÐ½Õ ÐÎÈÇÎÀÅÍÈ ÅÐÈÍŽÁ ÒÎ×.
£ÉÄÉ˾ÒÅÐÁ ÇÉÁ ÒÉÕ Ñ×ÍÓ¼ËÅÕ, ÅÐÈÍŽÁ ŽÍÁÉ È ÄÉÁÍÎÈÒÉ˼ ÄÉÅÐÇÁѽÁ Î× ÁÎÑËÎ-
Ž ÑÒÈÍ ËÁÒÁ;ÈÑÈ ÒÈÕ Ñ×ÍÓ¼ËÈÕ, ÒÎÍ ËÁÓÎÐÉѾ ÒÈÕ ÅÍÍνÁÕ ÒÈÕ ËÁÉ ÒÈ ÖÐÁÊÈ ÒÔÍ
ÎнÔÍ ÅÆÁÐÎÇ¼Õ ÒÈÕ. ÉÁ ̾ÇÎ×Õ ÁÉÄÁÇÔÇÉËÎÀÕ ÄÉÁËнÍÎ×Å Ñ×ͼÓÔÕ Áؽ Å ÒÎÍ
Ch.Rousseau (
Traité de droit international
I) ÄÀÎ ÂÁÑÉË ØÈÒ¼ÁÒÁ: (1) ÎÉÎÕ ÅÐÈÍÅÀÅÉ
ÒÈ Ñ×ÍÓ¼ËÈ ËÁÉ (2) ÏÕ ÒÈÍ ÅÐÈÍÅÀÅÉ.
1. ÎÉÎÕ ÅÐÈÍÅÀÅÉ
Á) ¬Õ ÐÎÕ ÒÎ ÐÏÒÎ ÅÐÏÒÈÁ, Æ×ÑÉË, ÒÈ Ñ×ÍÓ¼ËÈ ÎÐÎÀÍ ÍÁ ÒÈÍ ÅÐÈÍÅÀ-
ÑÎ×Í
Á×ÓÅÍÒÉË ÎÉ ½ÄÉÎÉ ÎÉ Ñ×ÂÁÌ̾ÅÍÎÉ
(ÍÔÎľÒÈÑÈ ÒÎ× ³ ÑÒÈÍ
Y¾ÓÅÑÈ ÒÈÕ