Background Image
Previous Page  49 / 60 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 49 / 60 Next Page
Page Background

127

§£©¡œ¡¦¯ IV

£°¨¥®£¦¡ ±¬® Ÿ²®›¥§¬®

– P. Merkouris, Article 31(3)(c) VCLT and the Principle of Systemic Integration:

Normative

Shadows in Plato’s Cave, Leiden 2015. - A. Aust: Modern Treaty Law and Practice, ¾.. Lord

Mc Nair, The Law of Treaties,¾.., 364. –

Sir I. Sinclair:

The Vienna Convention, ¾.., 114.

P. Reuter:

Introduction to the Law of Treaties, ¾.., 73. –

Ch. Rousseau:

Droit International

public (I), 241. –

¦. Brownlie:

Principles of Public International Law, 2003, 602. –

N. Politis:

«Méthodes d’interprétation du droit conventionnel», Mélanges F.Geny, 1935, 374. –

Ch. de

Visscher:

Problèmes d’interprétation judiciaire en droit international public, Paris 1963. –

R.

Bernhardt:

Die Auslegung völkerrechtlicher Verträge, Köln 1963. –

±Î× Á×ÒÎÀ:

«Evolutive Treaty

Interpretation, Especially of the European Convention of Human Rights», German Y.B.I.L.

1999, 11. –

K. Yasseen:

L’interprétation des traités d’après la Convention de Vienne sur le droit

des traités, R.C.A.D.I. 1976 (III). –

M. Mc Dougal, H. Lasswell, J. Miller:

The Interpretation of

Agreements and World Order, New Haven 1967. –

Sir H. Lauterpacht:

«De l’interprétation des

traités», Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International 1950, 1952. –

Sir G. Fitzmaurice:

«The

Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice: Treaty Interpretation», B.Y.B.I.L.

1951, 28. –

D. Simon:

L’interprétation judiciaire des traités d’organisation internationale,

Paris 1981. –

S. Sur:

L’interprétation en droit international public, Paris 1971. –

Sh. Rosenne:

«Conceptualism as a Guide to Treaty Interpretation», Mélanges R.Ago (I), 417. –

F. Capotorti:

«Sul valore délla prassi applicativa dei trattati seconda la Convenzione di Vienna», Mélanges

R.Ago (I), 197. –

M. Tabory:

Multilinguanism in International Law and Institutions, Alphen

1980. –

§. §ÎÀÆÁ:

¥ ÌÅÉÒÎ×ÐǽÁ ÒÔÍ ÐÊÅÔÍ Ë×ÂÅÐͼÑÅÔÕ ÑÒÉÕ ÄÉÅÓÍÅ½Õ ÑÖ»ÑÅÉÕ, ›ÅÑÑÁÌÎͽËÈ

1983-1985. –

M. Halberstam:

«A Treaty Is a Treaty Is a Treaty», Virginia I.I.I 1992, 51. – Ch.

Tietje: The Changing Legal Structure of International Treaties as an Aspect of an Emerging

Global Governance Architecture», German YBIL, 1999, 26.

– H. Schermers:

«International

Organizations and the Law of Treaties», ¾., 1999, 56. - M. Fitzmaurice, O. Elias, P. Merkouris

(eds.), Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years On

(Leiden, 2010). –

A. Gourgourinis:

“The Distinction Between Interpretation and Application of

Norms in International Adjudication”, J. Int. Dispute Settlement, 2011, 35.

¥ ÅÆÁЌÎǼ ÅÍ¾Õ ËÅɌ»ÍÎ× ÄÅÍ Å½ÍÁÉ Ä×ÍÁÒ¼ ÖÔÐ½Õ ÐÎÈÇÎÀŒÅÍÈ ÅЌÈÍŽÁ ÒÎ×.

£ÉÄÉ˾ÒÅÐÁ ÇÉÁ ÒÉÕ Ñ×ÍÓ¼ËÅÕ, ÅЌÈÍŽÁ ŽÍÁÉ È ÄÉÁÍÎÈÒÉ˼ ÄÉÅÐÇÁѽÁ Î× ÁÎÑËÎ-

Å½ ÑÒÈÍ ËÁÒÁ;ÈÑÈ ÒÈÕ Ñ×ÍÓ¼ËÈÕ, ÒÎÍ ËÁÓÎÐÉь¾ ÒÈÕ ÅÍÍνÁÕ ÒÈÕ ËÁÉ ÒÈ ÖÐÁÊÈ ÒÔÍ

ÎнÔÍ ÅÆÁЌÎÇ¼Õ ÒÈÕ. ™ÉÁ ̾ÇÎ×Õ ÁÉÄÁÇÔÇÉËÎÀÕ ÄÉÁËнÍÎ׌ŠÑ×ͼÓÔÕ ŒÁؽ ŒÅ ÒÎÍ

Ch.Rousseau (

Traité de droit international

I) ÄÀÎ ÂÁÑÉË ØÈÒ¼ŒÁÒÁ: (1) žÎÉÎÕ ÅЌÈÍÅÀÅÉ

ÒÈ Ñ×ÍÓ¼ËÈ ËÁÉ (2) žÏÕ ÒÈÍ ÅЌÈÍÅÀÅÉ.

1. žÎÉÎÕ ÅЌÈÍÅÀÅÉ

Á) ¬Õ ÐÎÕ ÒÎ ÐÏÒÎ ÅÐÏÒȌÁ, Æ×ÑÉË, ÒÈ Ñ×ÍÓ¼ËÈ ŒÎÐÎÀÍ ÍÁ ÒÈÍ ÅЌÈÍÅÀ-

ÑÎ×Í

Á×ÓÅÍÒÉË ÎÉ ½ÄÉÎÉ ÎÉ Ñ׌ÂÁÌ̾ŒÅÍÎÉ

(™ÍԌÎľÒÈÑÈ ÒÎ× šš³ ÑÒÈÍ

Y¾ÓÅÑÈ ÒÈÕ