Previous Page  25 / 40 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 25 / 40 Next Page
Page Background

ņŋń¨Łŏņ ńŌńŐŃńňŁʼnņ ŁŃŎŐŁ

359

ū›ŷůŢ ŧŞŦ ū EMIR šŢũ ŢűŞŬ—ŷţŢůŞŦ ۛūŲŬŢŴůŦŧř. ņ Ű›ŞŠŴŠś ůūŰŭ ŮŢ

ŞŰůŷũ ůŢŨŢŜ ۛŷ ›ŬūŶ›ūťŚŮŢŦŭ. ńũšŢŦŧůŦŧŹŭ, ŠŦŞ ũŞ Ű›ŞŲťūŸũ ťŞ ›ŬŚ-

›ŢŦ ūŦ ŞũůŦŮۗşŞŨŨŷ—ŢũūŦ ŮůŦŭ ŮŲŢůŦŧŚŭ ŮۗşřŮŢŦŭ ũŞ ŢŜũŞŦ ŲŬŤ—ŞůūūŦ-

ŧūũū—ŦŧūŜ ŞũůŦŮۗşŞŨŨŷ—ŢũūŦ (řŬťŬ. 2 ›ŞŬ. 8 EMIR)

592

ŮŸ—űŴũŞ —Ţ ůŞ

ůŦŮůŤŬŦŞŧŹũ ›ŞŬŞŠŹŠŴũ ŠŦŞ ůūŰŭ Ůŧū›ūŸŭ ŢűŞŬ—ūŠśŭ ůŤŭ Ŵŭ řũŴ šŦřůŞŪŤŭ

ůūŰ EMIR ›ŢŬŦŨŞ—şřũŢŦ ůŦŭ ŢŪśŭ ›ŢŬŦ›ůŹŮŢŦŭ ŮۗşřŮŢŴũ: «

(a) Derivative con-

tracts traded on MTFs are OTC derivatives in the context of EMIR. (b) The

deÀnition explicitly refers to the place of execution (“a derivative contract

the execution of which does not take place on a regulated market”). The

characteristics that these contracts have in common with exchange traded

derivatives are therefore not relevant for the purpose of the deÀnition of

OTC derivatives. (c) Derivative contracts executed on non-EU exchanges that

are equivalent to a regulated market in accordance with Article 19(6) of

MiFID do not count for the purpose of the determination of the clearing

threshold. Derivatives traded in other non-EU exchanges will count for the

determination of the clearing threshold. Article 19(6) states that the Euro-

pean Commission shall publish a list of those exchanges that are to be con-

sidered as equivalent. To date, there is no publicly available list of non-EU

exchange equivalent to a regulated market, as envisaged under Article 19(6)

of MiFID. In the absence of this list, all derivative contracts executed on non–

EU exchanges should be counted for the purpose of the determination of the

clearing threshold. (d) Derivatives transactions, such as block trades, which

are executed outside the trading platform of the regulated market, but are

subject to the rules of the regulated market and are executed in compliance

with those rules, including the immediate processing by the regulated mar-

ket after execution and the clearing by a CCP, should not be regarded as OTC

derivatives transactions. Therefore, these transactions should not be con-

sidered for the purpose of the clearing obligation and the calculation of the

clearing threshold by NFC that only relates to OTC derivatives. Derivatives

transactions that do not meet the conditions listed in the Àrst paragraph of

this subanswer (d) should be considered OTC. For example, derivatives con-

tracts that are not executed on a regulated market and are not governed by

the rules of an exchange at the point of execution should be considered OTC

even if after execution they are exchanged for contracts traded in a regu-

lated market. However, the replacement contract itself may be considered

exchange traded if it meets the relevant conditions.

».

592. ʼnŞůř ůŤũ ūŦŧŢŜŞ šŦřůŞŪŤ ůŤŭ ›ŞŬ. 8 ůūŰ řŬťŬūŰ 2 ůūŰ EMIR Ŵŭ ŲŬŤ—ŞůūūŦŧū-

ũū—ŦŧūŜ ŞũůŦŮۗşŞŨŨŷ—ŢũūŦ ūŬŜţūũůŞŦ ūŦ ޛŦŲŢŦŬśŮŢŦŭ ޛŢũšŸŮŢŴũ ›ūŰ ŚŲūŰũ

řšŢŦŞ ŨŢŦůūŰŬŠŜŞŭ ŮŸ—űŴũŞ —Ţ ůŤũ ūšŤŠŜŞ 2004/39/ńʼn, ›ŦŮůŴůŦŧř ŦšŬŸ—ŞůŞ

›ūŰ ŚŲūŰũ řšŢŦŞ ŨŢŦůūŰŬŠŜŞŭ ŮŸ—űŴũŞ —Ţ ůŤũ ūšŤŠŜŞ 2006/48/ńʼn, ŞŮűŞ-

ŨŦŮůŦŧŚŭ ޛŦŲŢŦŬśŮŢŦŭ ›ūŰ ŚŲūŰũ řšŢŦŞ ŨŢŦůūŰŬŠŜŞŭ ŮŸ—űŴũŞ —Ţ ůŤũ ūšŤŠŜŞ

73/239/ńŎʼn, ŞŮűŞŨŦŮůŦŧŚŭ ޛŦŲŢŦŬśŮŢŦŭ ›ūŰ ŚŲūŰũ řšŢŦŞ ŨŢŦůūŰŬŠŜŞŭ ŮŸ—űŴ-

ũŞ —Ţ ůŤũ ūšŤŠŜŞ 2002/83/ńʼn, ŞũůŞŮűŞŨŦŮůŦŧŚŭ ޛŦŲŢŦŬśŮŢŦŭ ›ūŰ ŚŲūŰũ řšŢŦŞ

ŨŢŦůūŰŬŠŜŞŭ ŮŸ—űŴũŞ —Ţ ůŤũ ūšŤŠŜŞ 2005/68/ńʼn, ŎőńʼnŁ ŧŞŦ, ŷ›ūŰ ›ŬūŮśŧŢŦ,

ūŦ šŦŞŲŢŦŬŦŮůŦŧŚŭ ŢůŞŦŬŜŢŭ ůūŰŭ ›ūŰ ŚŲūŰũ ŞšŢŦūšūůŤťŢŜ ŮŸ—űŴũŞ —Ţ ůŤũ ūšŤ-

ŠŜŞ 2009/65/ńʼn, ŦšŬŸ—ŞůŞ Ţ›ŞŠŠŢŨ—ŞůŦŧŹũ ŮŰũůŞŪŦūšūůŦŧŹũ ›ŞŬūŲŹũ, ŧŞůř

ůŤũ ŚũũūŦŞ ůūŰ řŬťŬūŰ 6 ŮůūŦŲŢŜū Ş) ůŤŭ ūšŤŠŜŞŭ 2003/41/ńʼn, ŧŞŦ ūŬŠŞũŦٗūŜ