Previous Page  34 / 46 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 34 / 46 Next Page
Page Background

112 ¨ňńŇŌņő ńŋŏŎŐňʼnņ ¨ňŁňŒņőňŁ ʼnŁň ńŔŁŐŋŎŃņ ŒŸŌ ʼnŁŌŎŌŸŌ ŁŌŒŁŃŸŌňőŋŎœ

ŨŦůŦŧś ŧŞŦ ›ūŰ ŬŰť—ŜţūŰũ ůŤ šū—ś ŧŞŦ ůŤ ŨŢŦůūŰŬŠŜŞ ůŤŭ ŢŮŴůŢŬŦŧśŭ ŞŠū-

Ŭřŭ. ńŪřŨŨūŰ, Ůůū ›ŨŞŜŮŦū ůŤŭ ńŰŬŴ›Şŵŧśŭ Śũũū—Ťŭ ůřŪŤŭ, Ť Ş—űŦŮşśůŤ-

ŮŤ ŞŰůś ůŬūűūšūůśťŤŧŢ Ş›ŷ ůū šŦŧŞŦūšūůŦŧŷ —ūũū›ŹŨŦū ůŤŭ ń›ŦůŬū›śŭ ޛŜ

ůūŰ ›ŬŹŤũ ĸŬťŬūŰ 81(3) őŰũťńʼn.

16. ņ šŰũŞůŷůŤůŞ Ű›ŞŠŴŠśŭ ŮŢ šŦŞŦůŤŮŜŞ ůŴũ šŦŞűūŬŹũ ›ūŰ ŮŰũšŚūũůŞŦ

—Ţ ůŤũ ŢűŞŬ—ūŠś ůūŰ šŦŧŞŜūŰ ŞũůŞŠŴũŦٗūŸ ŞűūŬř ŮůŦŭ ŞŮůŦŧūŸ šŦŧŞŜūŰ

›ůŰŲŚŭ ůŤŭ ŢŧřŮůūůŢ ŞũůŦ-ŞũůŞŠŴũŦŮůŦŧśŭ Ůۗ›ŢŬŦűūŬřŭ

363

. őŰũޛŹŭ, šŢ-

ŧůŦŧř šŦŞŦůŤŮŜŞŭ ŢŜũŞŦ ůŞ ţŤůś—ŞůŞ ›ūŰ ŮŲŢůŜţūũůŞŦ —Ţ ůŤ šŦřŠũŴŮŤ ŧŞŦ ޛŦ-

şūŨś ůŴũ ŞŮůŦŧŹũ, ŧŞŦ ŷŲŦ ůŴũ šŦūŦŧŤůŦŧŹũ (ś ŢũŜūůŢ ůŴũ ›ūŦũŦŧŹũ), ũū—Ŧ-

ŧŹũ ›ŬūŶ›ūťŚŮŢŴũ ŧŞŦ Ţũũŷ—Ŵũ ŮŰũޛŢŦŹũ, ŞũůŜŮůūŦŲŞ, ůŴũ ›ŞŬŞşřŮŢ-

Ŵũ ůūŰ šŦŧŞŜūŰ ›ŢŬŜ ŢŨŢŸťŢŬūŰ ŞũůŞŠŴũŦٗūŸ

364

. ŒŚůūŦŞ ţŤůś—ŞůŞ Ş›ūůŢ-

ŨūŸũ ޛŜ ›ŞŬŞšŢŜŠ—ŞůŦ Ť ŧśŬŰŪŤ ůŤŭ ŞŧŰŬŷůŤůŞŭ ůūŰ ũŰũ ĸŬťŬūŰ 101(2)

őŰũťŊńń, Ť ޛŦšŜŧŞŮŤ ›ŨśŬūŰŭ ś ŧŞŦ ›ūŦũŦŧśŭ/ůŦ—ŴŬŤůŦŧśŭ

365

Ş›ūţŤ—ŜŴ-

363. ŃŦŞ ůŤũ ›ŞŬŞšūŲś ŞŰůś şŨ. ŢũšŢŦŧůŦŧř L. Idot, ŷ.›., 1996, ŮŢŨ.

561 ޛ., B. Ha-

notiau, ŷ.›., 1997, ŮŢŨ. 31-64, J. Lew/L. Mistelis/S. Kröll, ŷ.›., 2003, ŮŢŨ. 201

ŧŞŦ 485, N. Shelkoplyas, ŷ.›., 2003, ŮŢŨ. 254-255, S. Dempegiotis,

EC competi-

tion law and international commercial arbitration: A new era in the interplay

of these legal orders and a new challenge for the European Commission

, 1 GAR,

2008, ŮŢŨ. 135-148, ŮůŦŭ ŮŢŨ. 138-139, ŧŞŦ ő. ʼnūŰŮūŸŨŤ, ŷ.›., 1996, ŮŢŨ. 56.

364. ŃŦŞ —ŜŞ ŞũůŜťŢůŤ ř›ūųŤ Ůůū ŢŨŨŤũŦŧŷ šŜŧŞŦū ŧŞŦ ŮŰŠŧŢŧŬŦ—ŚũŞ Ůůū ›ŨŞŜŮŦū ůūŰ Ō.

703/1977

›ţŭŝ ţũśšųŬű —ŬŪŬ›ŵũŝŵŪ Ũşŧ ŬũŧšŬ›ŵũŝŵŪ Ũşŧ ›ŭŬůŰşůŝşŮ ŰŬű ţũţŹŦţ-

ŭŬű şŪŰşšŵŪŧů—ŬŹ

, ŷ›Ŵŭ ŞŰůŷŭ ŜŮŲŰŢ ›ŬŦũ Ş›ŷ ůŤũ ůŬū›ū›ūŜŤŮś ůūŰ Ş›ŷ ůūũ Ō.

3784/2009, şŨ. ŋ.Ň. ŋŞŬŜũūŰ,

ŌţŭŧŨśŮ ›şŭşŰťŭŜůţŧŮ šŧş Űť ŢŧŬŧŨťŰŧŨŜ ŢŧşŢŧŨşůŝş

ůŰş ›ũşŝůŧş ŰŬű Ū. 703 ŨşŰŚ ŰŵŪ ›ţŭŧŬŭŧů—źŪ ŰŬű şŪŰşšŵŪŧů—ŬŹ

, 33 ńŨŨ¨, 1992,

ŮŢŨ. 1402 ޛ., ŮůŤ ŮŢŨ. 1403, ŧŞŦ ő. ʼnūŰŮūŸŨŤ,

¨ŧŨŬŪŬ—ŧŨŚ ŤťŰŜ—şŰş ţŪź›ŧŬŪ ŰťŮ

Ņ›ŧŰŭŬ›ŜŮ łŪŰşšŵŪŧů—ŬŹ

, ŮŢ: ň. őŲŦũř (Ţŧš.),

ŐŭŬůŰşůŝş ŰŬű ţũţŹŦţŭŬű şŪŰşšŵ-

Ūŧů—ŬŹ

, őřŧŧūŰŨŞŭ, 1992, ŮŢŨ. 291 ޛ., ŮůŦŭ ŮŢŨ. 298-299. ŎŦ Ş›ŷųŢŦŭ ŞŰůŚŭ ŞũůŦ-

ŧŬūŸūũůŞŦ Ůś—ŢŬŞ Ş›ŷ ůŞ ›ūŬŜٗŞůŞ ůŤŭ ũū—ūŨūŠŜŞŭ

Eco Swiss

ůūŰ ¨ŦŧŞŮůŤŬŜūŰ

ůŤŭ ĺũŴŮŤŭ ŧŞŦ Ş›ŷ ůŞ ũŚŞ šŢšū—ŚũŞ ůūŰ ŧŞťŢŮůŹůūŭ ›ūŰ ŢŦŮśŠŞŠŢ ū ʼnŞũūũŦٗŷŭ

1/2003, ŷ›Ŵŭ ŞŰůř ŞũŞŨŸťŤŧŞũ ŮŢ ›ŬūŤŠūŸ—Ţũū ŧŢűřŨŞŦū.

365. ŃŦŞ ůū ţśůŤ—Ş ůŤŭ ޛŦšŜŧŞŮŤŭ ›ŞŬŞšŢŦŠ—ŞůŦŧśŭ Ş›ūţŤ—ŜŴŮŤŭ (punitive damages)

Ş›ŷ ůŞ šŦŢťũś šŦŞŦůŤůŦŧř šŦŧŞŮůśŬŦŞ şŨ. K. Noussia,

Punitive Damages in Arbitra-

tion: Panacea or Curse?

, 27(3) JoIA, 2010, ŮŢŨ. 277-294, R. Cunnington,

Should

Punitive Damages be Part of the Judicial Arsenal in Contract Cases?

, 26(3) Le-

gal Studies, 2006, ŮŢŨ. 369 ޛ., ŮůŤ ŮŢŨ. 370, A. Matheson/P. Rogers Chepiga,

Available in America: Punitive Damages in Arbitration

, 7(4) IALR, 2004, ŮŢŨ. 115

ޛ., ŧŞŦ S.P. Bedell,

Punitive Damages in Arbitration

, 21 JMLR, 1988, ŮŢŨ. 21

ޛ., ŮůŤ ŮŢŨ. 27. ŃŦŞ —ŜŞ ŮŰŠŧŬŦůŦŧś ŞũřŨŰŮŤ şŨ. G. Georgiades,

Punitive Dam-

ages in Europe and the USA: Doctrinal Differences and Practical Convergence

,

58 RHDI, 2005, ŮŢŨ. 145 ޛ., V. Behr,

Punitive Damages in American and German

Law: Tendencies Towards Approximation of Apparently Irreconcilable Concepts

,

78 CKLR, 2003, ŮŢŨ. 105 ޛ., ŧŞŦ M. Danov,

Awarding Exemplary (or Punitive)

Antitrust Damages in EC Competition Cases with an International Element

, ECLR

2008, ŮŢŨ. 430 ޛ. őůŤ ŲŹŬŞ —Şŭ, ŚŲŢŦ ŧŬŦťŢŜ (ŎŨŁŏ 17/1999, Ōūł 2000, ŮŢŨ. 461)

ŷůŦ šŢũ ›ŞŬޗ›ūšŜţŢůŞŦ Ť ŧśŬŰŪŤ Ŵŭ ŢŧůŢŨŢŮůśŭ ŞŨŨūšŞ›śŭ šŦŞŦůŤůŦŧśŭ Ş›ŷűŞ-