ΔΙΕΘΝΗΣ ΕΜΠΟΡΙΚΗ ΔΙΑΙΤΗΣΙΑ ΚΑΙ ΕΦΑΡΜΟΓΗ ΤΩΝ ΚΑΝΟΝΩΝ ΑΝΤΑΓΩΝΙΣΜΟΥ

36 / 46

114 ¨ňńŇŌņő ńŋŏŎŐňʼnņ ¨ňŁňŒņőňŁ ʼnŁň ńŔŁŐŋŎŃņ ŒŸŌ ʼnŁŌŎŌŸŌ ŁŌŒŁŃŸŌňőŋŎœ
şŦşŨŦūŠŬŞűŦŧś370 ŧŞŦ ũū—ūŨūŠŦŞŧś371 ޛŢŪŢŬŠŞŮŜŞ ŧŞŦ ŮůŦŭ šŸū ņ›ŢŜŬūŰŭ.
ŋřŨŦŮůŞ, ŢũŹ Ť Ţũ ŨŷŠŴ Ş›ŷűŞŮŤ ŞűūŬūŸŮŢ ŮůŤũ ŢűŞŬ—ūŠś ůūŰ Ł—ŢŬŦ-
ŧŞũŦŧūŸ šŦŧŞŜūŰ, ŢŜŲŢ ŦŮŲŰŬŷ ŞũůŜŧůۛū ŮůŤũ Ş›ŷ —ŚŬūŰŭ ůŤŭ ńŰŬŴ›Şŵŧśŭ
Śũũū—Ťŭ ůřŪŤŭ ŞũůŦ—ŢůŹ›ŦŮŤ ůŤŭ ŮŲŚŮŤŭ —ŢůŞŪŸ ůūŰ ńŰŬŴ›ŞŵŧūŸ šŦŧŞŜūŰ
ŞũůŞŠŴũŦٗūŸ ŧŞŦ ůūŰ ťŢٗūŸ ůŤŭ šŦŢťũūŸŭ šŦŞŦůŤŮŜŞŭ. ńšŹ ŧŞŦ šŢŧŞŢůŜŢŭ,
ůŞ şŞŮŦŧř ›ūŬŜٗŞůŞ ůŤŭ Ş›ŷűŞŮŤŭ Mitsubishi Ŵŭ ›Ŭūŭ ůŦŭ šŦřűūŬŢŭ ›ůŰ-
ŲŚŭ ůŤŭ Ŵŭ řũŴ ŮŲŚŮŤŭ Ůۗ›ŰŧũŹũūŰũ ůŤũ ޛŦŧŬŞůūŸŮŞ šŦŢťũŹŭ ťŢŴŬŤůŦ-
ŧś ŧŞŦ ũū—ūŨūŠŦŞŧś ťŚŮŤ ŠŦŞ ůŞ ťŚ—ŞůŞ ŞŰůř372.
3.2.1 ŏŬŞŠ—ŞůŦŧř ›ŢŬŦŮůŞůŦŧř ůŤŭ ۛŷťŢŮŤŭ
18. ņ Chrysler International S.A. (Ůůū ŢŪśŭ: CISA), —ŜŞ ńŨşŢůŦŧś ޛŦŲŢŜŬŤ-
ŮŤ, ŧŞŦ Ť Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Inc., —ŜŞ ňŞ›ŴũŦŧś ޛŦŲŢŜŬŤŮŤ, ŮŰ-
ũśųŞũ —ŜŞ ŮۗűŴũŜŞ šŤ—ŦūŰŬŠŜŞŭ —ŜŞŭ ŧūŦũśŭ ޛŦŲŢŜŬŤŮŤŭ (joint venture
agreement) —Ţ ůŤũ ޛŴũۗŜŞ ‘Mitsubishi Motors Corp’ (Ůůū ŢŪśŭ: Mitsubi-
370. łŨ. ŢũšŢŦŧůŦŧř W. Blagg, Arbitrability of Antitrust Claims Arising from an Inter-
national Commercial Contract: Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Play-
mouth, Inc., 16 GJICL, 1985, ŮŢŨ. 355-367, S. Jarvin, Arbitrability of anti-trust
disputes: the Mitsubishi v. Soler case, 2(3) JoIA, 1985, ŮŢŨ. 69-81, J. Amon, Anti-
trust Claims: Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements on International Claims:
Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Playmouth Inc., 10 STLJ, 1986, ŮŢŨ.
213-227, A. Lowenfeld, The Mitsubishi case: Another View, 2(3) ArbInt, 1986,
ŮŢŨ. 178-190, ŧŞŦ J. Pietrowski, Enforcing International Commercial Arbitration
Agreements – Post Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Crysler Plymouth Inc., 36
AULR, 1986, ŮŢŨ. 57 ޛ. ŃŦŞ ŧŬŦůŦŧś şŨ. S. Cloud, Mitsubishi and the Arbitrabil-
ity of Antitrust Claims: Did the Supreme Court Throw the Baby Out With the
Bathwater?, 18 LPIB, 1986, ŮŢŨ. 341-369, T. Carbonneau, Mitsubishi: the folly of
quixotic internationalism, 2(2) ArbInt, 1986, ŮŢŨ. 116-139, H. Smit, Mitsubishi: It
is Not What It Seems to Be, 4(3) JoIA, 1987, ŮŢŨ. 7-24, ŧŞŦ M. Moses, Arbitration
Law: Who’s in Charge?, SHLR , 2009, ŮŢŨ. 23.
371. łŨ. ŢũšŢŦŧůŦŧř ¨ńʼn Ş›ŷűŞŮŤ ůŤŭ 1.6.1999, œ›ūť. C-126/97, Eco Swiss, őŰŨŨ.
1999, ň-3055, ŮŧŚųŢŦŭ 36-39, ŧŞŦ ŁũŹůŞůū Ŏ—ūٛūũšŦŞŧŷ ¨ŦŧŞŮůśŬŦū ůŴũ ņ.ŏ.Ł.
Ş›ŷűŞŮŤ ůŤŭ 08.06.1987, ŮůŤũ ۛŷťŢŮŤ Shearson/American Express, 107 .
2332 (1987), Ş›ŷűŞŮŤ ůŤŭ 11.10.1991, ŮůŤũ ۛŷťŢŮŤ Gilmer v. Interstate/John-
son Lane Corp., 111 . 1647, ŧŞŦ Ş›ŷűŞŮŤ ůŤŭ 03.06.1994, ŮůŤũ ۛŷťŢŮŤ Ng-
hiem v. NEC Electronics Inc., 92(9) CA 16155.
372. łŨ. ůŤ —ŢŨŚůŤ ůŤŭ UNCITRAL Ůůū ›ŨŞŜŮŦū ůŴũ šŦŢŬŠŞŮŦŹũ ŠŦŞ ůŤũ ›ŬūŢůūŦ—ŞŮŜŞ
ůūŰ ŏŬŷůۛūŰ Ōŷ—ūŰ ůūŰ 1985 ›ŢŬŜ ůŤŭ šŦŢťũūŸŭ ޗ›ūŬŦŧśŭ šŦŞŦůŤŮŜŞŭ: Secre-
tariat Study on the New York Convention, A/CN9/168, 20.04.1979, ›ŞŬ. 45, ŧŞ-
ťŹŭ ŧŞŦ C. Kaplan, A Case by Case Examination of Whether National Courts Apply
Different Standards When Assisting Arbitral Proceedings and Enforcing Awards in
International Cases as Contrasting with Domestic Disputes. Is There a Worldwide
Trend towards Supporting an International Arbitration Culture?, ŮŢ: A. van den
Berg (Ţŧš.), ICCA Handbook on Commercial Arbitration – No. 8, Kluwer 1984,
ŮŢŨ. 191.