

456
³°. ±¯²§¡
¯¦§¯£®£¦¡§¯ ¦£®£ ¦§¡¦¯
¢ÉÂÌÉÎÇÐÁƽÁ – ¡ÐÓÐÎÇÐÁƽÁ
£ÌÌÈÍÉ˼:
– ´ÍÓÉÎÕ ¡.
, ¡Ð 2012,671-672.
– ¢ÁлÐÈÕ A.,
¥ ×ÅÐÅÓÍÉ˼ ÉÑÖÀÕ ÒÈÕ ÌÈÊÉÁÐÖÉË¼Õ Ð-
ÊÈÕ - ¡ÑÆÁÌ¼Õ ÁÍÒÁÌÌÁǼ ÌÈÐÎÆÎÐÉÏÍ ÅÒÁÊÀ ÆÎлÔÍ ÒÎ× ÈÎѽÎ× ÄÉÁÆÎÐÅÒÉËÏÍ ËÐÁÒÏÍ
(ÉÄÁËÒÎÐÉ˼ ÄÉÁÒÐɼ ÁÍÅÉÑÒ¼ÉÎ ¡ÓÈÍÏÍ 2016).
– ¢Ð»ÌÌÈÕ .,
¦ÄÉÔÒÉ˾ ÉÅÓÍ»Õ ½ËÁÉÎ,
2008
3
.
– ÉÅÓÍ¼Õ £ÉÒÐμ ÐÎÑÔÉË¼Õ §ÁÒÁÑÒÑÅÔÕ
- £ÌÌÈÍÉ˾ ±¼Á, £É.
. ¢Ð»ÌÌÈÕ,
¥
ÉÅÓÍ¼Õ £ÉÒÐμ ÐÎÑÔÉË¼Õ §ÁÒÁÑÒÑÅÔÕ ËÁÉ Î ¯ÉËÎÇÅÍÅÉÁË¾Õ ¢½ÎÕ (2011).
– §ÁÒÑÉ»ÐÎ×
¡.,
£££×Ð 28 (2008),698-700.
– §Ð½ÑÈÕ ¥.,
¦ÄÉÔÒÉË¾Í ÉÅÓÍ»Õ ½ËÁÉÎÍ - ÅÍÉË¾Í »ÐÎÕ, 1970.
– ¨ÉÖÁÈ̽ÄÎ× ³Ð.,
¤ÈÒ¼ÁÒÁ ÁÍÁÇÍÏÐÉÑÈÕ ÒÎ× ÅÔÍÀÎ× Î× Æ»ÐÅÉ »ÍÁ оÑÔÎ ÂÑÅÉ ÍÎ-
ÎÓÅѽÁÕ ËÐÒÎ×Õ »ÌÎ×Õ Á¾ ÌÌÎ ËÐÒÎÕ »ÌÎÕ, £Æ¡ 2 (2009),239-241.
– ¨ÁËÉÐÒØ¼Õ E./
±ÑÉÆÎÎÀÌÎ× £.,
ÈÊÉÁÐÖÉË»Õ ÐÊÅÉÕ Å ÑÒÎÉÖŽÁ ÁÌÌÎÄÁ¾ÒÈÒÁÕ ËÁÒ ÒÈ ÄÉÎÉËÈÒÉ˼ ËÁÉ ÄÉ-
ËÁÑÒÉ˼ ÐÁËÒÉ˼, 2009.
– ÁÎÀËÈÕ ³.,
¦ÄÉÔÒÉ˾ ÄÉÅÓÍ»Õ Ä½ËÁÉÎ ËÁÉ £¡ 1996,994-1002.
– ÁÎÀËÈÕ ³.
(ÅÉ.), §ÌÈÐÎÍÎÉ˾ ÉÅÓÍ»Õ ½ËÁÉÎ, 2016.
– ÎÌÄÒÎÕ .,
ÈÊÉÁÐÖÉË»Õ Ð-
ÊÅÉÕ ¦ÓÁÇ»ÍÅÉÁ ÈÎÒÎ̾ÇÉÁ (§ÔÄÉËÎÎÉÈ»ÍÈ ®ÎÎÓÅѽÁ - £ÐÈÍŽÁ - ®ÎÎÌÎǽÁ), 1998.
– ÈÌÉÔÒ¾Î×ÌÎÕ £.,
£ÇÖÅÉнÄÉÎ ÄÉÎÉËÈÒÉËÎÀ ÄÉËÁ½Î×, ±¾ÎÕ ÐÏÒÎÕ, 2011
14
.
– ±ËÈÕ ¡Ó.,
¡Ð
68 (2014),2143-2144.
– ±ÁÇÁÐÕ ³.,
±Î ÉÄÉÔÒÉ˾ ÄÉÅÓÍ»Õ Ä½ËÁÉÎ ÔÕ ÅÐÇÁÌŽΠŽÌ×ÑÈÕ ×ÁÌÌÈ-
ÌÉËÏÍ ÄÉÁÆÎÐÏÍ Á¾ ÒÎ ÉËÁÑÒ¼ÐÉΠȾÑÉÁÕ ÉνËÈÑÈÕ ÒÈÕ £×ÐÔÁÙË¼Õ µÍÔÑÈÕ, ÉÉË KE
(2013),289-299.
– ±ÑÎÀËÁ ³Ð.,
±Î ÍÎÉ˾ ËÁÓÅÑÒÏÕ ÒÔÍ ÐÎËÐÉÒÔÍ ÑÒÎ ÌÁ½ÑÉÎ ÒÎ× ÉÄÉÔÒÉËÎÀ
ÄÉÅÓÍÎÀÕ ÄÉËÁ½Î× ÒÈÕ £×ÐÔÁÙË¼Õ £ÍÏÑÅÔÕ: È Å×ÐÔÁÙ˼ ÁÍÁÇ»ÍÍÈÑÈ ÅÍ¾Õ ÁÌÁÉÎÀ ÐÎÂ̼Á-
ÒÎÕ;, ÑÅ: ±ÉÈÒÉ˾ ±¾Î ×нÄÔÍÎÕ ¢Ì. ¢Ð»ÌÌÈ – Å ÁÍÁؼÒÈÑÈ ÒÈÕ ÄÉËÁÉÎÑÀÍÈÕ, 2014, 2014, ÑÅÌ.
1055-1078.
– ³Ì»ÁÕ ®.-§.,
±ÎÉ˼ Á×ÒÎÄÉνËÈÑÈ, ÑÅ:
£. ÈÌÉÔÒ¾Î×ÌÎ×/¡ÍÒ. ¨ÁËÐ×ÄȼÒÐÈ
(ÅÉ.), ¥ ÄȾÑÉÁ ÄÉνËÈÑÈ ÑÒÈÍ £ÌÌÄÁ, 2001.
Å;ÇÌÔÑÑÈ:
– Batiffol H./Lagarde P.,
Traité de droit international privé T.I, 1993
8
.
– Cornu G.,
Vocabulaire
juridique, 2000
8
.
– D’Avout L.,
Journal du droit international, 136 (2009), ÑÅÌ. 207-
216.
– De Groot G.-R.,
Towards European Conflict Rules in Matters of Personal Status,
Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 2004, ÑÅÌ. 115-119.
– Frank R.,
Die
Entscheidung des EuGH in Sachen Garcia Avello und ihre Auswirkung auf das internationale
Namensrecht, StAZ 15 (2005), ÑÅÌ. 161-168.
– Guide Pratique International de l’ tat Civil,
ÄÉÁÓ»ÑÉÎ ÑÒÈÍ ÈÌÅËÒÐÎÍÉ˼ ÄÉÅÀÓ×ÍÑÈ
http://www.ciec1.org/SiteCIEC/PAGE_Principale/GAUAAMOb8GxkSnpMU09xQ3lWAwA.
– Govaere In.,
“Setting the international scene”: EU
external competence and procedures post-Lisbon revisited in the light of ECJ Opinion 1/13,
Common Market Law Review 52 (2015), ÑÅÌ. 1277-1307.
– Kinsch P.,
L’apport de la jurispru-
dence de la Cour Européenne des Droits de l’Homme, ÑÅ: P. Lagarde (dir.), La reconnaissance des
situations en droit international privé (2013) ÑÅÌ. 43-55
. – Lagarde P.,
Rev. crit. DIP 93 (2004),
ÑÅÌ. 192-202.
– Lagarde P.,
Rev. crit. DIP 98 (2009), ÑÅÌ. 87-93.
– Lagarde P.,
The Movement
of civil-status Records in Europe, and the European Commission’s Proposal of 24 April 2013,
Yearbook of Private International Law 15 (2013/2014) ÑÅÌ. 1-12.
– Lipp V.,
Die “Anerkennung”
des ausländischen Namens eines Bürgers der Europäischen Union – Von «Konstantinidis» bis
«Runevi -Vardyn/Wardyn», ÑÅ: ±ÉÈÒÉ˾ ±¾Î ¢Ð»ÌÌÈ – Å ÁÍÁؼÒÈÑÈ ÒÈÕ ÄÉËÁÉÎÑÀÍÈÕ, 2014
ÑÅÌ. 539-556.
– Lipp V.,
Namensrecht und Europarecht - Die Entscheidung Grunkin-Paul II und
ihre Folgen für das deutsche Namensrecht, StAZ 19 (2009), ÑÅÌ. 1-8.
– Mathias ¨.,
Principe de
non-discrimination et transmission du nom de famille en Europe, D 180 (2004) Jur., ÑÅÌ. 1476-
1479.
– Meeusen J.,
The Grunkin and Paul Judgment of the ECJ, or How to Strike a Delicate