 
          £®£°£¦¡: ¦§±²¡&²¯¯¨£
        
        
          10
        
        
          . ¡¤¡°¦¡
        
        
          Áо̒Á×Ò, ÈÄÉÅÓÍ¼Õ ÍÎÎÌÎǽÁ »ÖÅÉ ÖÐÈÑÉÎÎɼÑÅÉ ÒÈÄÉËÐÉÑÈ.
        
        
          28
        
        
          ÀÆÔÍÁÁÅ ÒÈ
        
        
          ÄÉÅÓͼ ÍÎÎÌÎǽÁ, ÎÉ ×ÎÖÐÅÏÑÅÉÕ ÁÎÒÅÌ»ÑÁÒÎÕ ÁÁÉÒÎÀÍ ÒÈÍ Å½ÒÅ×ÊÈ, ÑÅ ËÓÅ Ñ×-
        
        
          ÇËÅËÐÉ»ÍÈ ÅнÒÔÑÈ, ÅÍ¾Õ Ñ×ÇËÅËÐÉ»ÍÎ× ÁÎÒÅÌ»ÑÁÒÎÕ.
        
        
          29
        
        
          ¯É ×ÎÖÐÅÏÑÅÉÕ ÁÎÒÅ-
        
        
          Ì»ÑÁÒÎÕ ÁÁÉÒÎÀÍ Á¾ ÒÁ ËÐÒÈ ÍÁ ÅÉÒÀÖÎ×Í »ÍÁÁÎÒ»ÌÅÑÁÁË¾È ËÁÉ ÑÅ ÑÖ»ÑÈÅ
        
        
          ÒÈ Ñ×ÅÐÉÆÎÐÆÎлÔÍ, ÒÔÍ ÎνÔÍ ÎÉ ÐÊÅÉÕ/ÁÐÁÌŽÃÅÉÕ ÄÅÍ ËÁÒÁÌÎǽØÎÍÒÁÉ ÑÒÎ
        
        
          ËÐÒÎÕ.
        
        
          ¡ÍÒ½ÓÅÒÁ, ÎÉ ×ÎÖÐÅÏÑÅÉÕ Ñ×ÅÐÉÆÎÐÕ ÄÅÍ ÁÁÉÒÎÀÍ Á¾ ÒÁ ËÐÒÈ ÍÁÅÒÀÖÎ×Í ËÒÔ
        
        
          Á¾¾ÌÅÕ ÒÉÕ Ñ×ÍÓ¼ËÅÕ ÒÈÍ Å½ÒÅ×ÊÈ ÅÍ¾Õ Ñ×ÇËÅËÐÉ»ÍÎ×ÁÎÒÅÌ»ÑÁÒÎÕ.
        
        
          30
        
        
          ¡×Ò¾ÄÅÍ ÑÈ-
        
        
          Á½ÍÅÉ ¾ÒÉ ÎÉ ×ÎÖÐÅÏÑÅÉÕÑ×ÅÐÉÆÎÐÕÑÒÅÐÎÀÍÒÁÉ ÅÐÉÅÖλÍÎ×.
        
        
          31
        
        
          ¡ÍÒ½ÓÅÒÁ, ×ÎÖÐÅ-
        
        
          ÏÍÎ×Í ÒÁËÐÒÈÍÁ«ÁÍÁÒÀÊÎ×Í ÒÁËÁÒÌÌÈÌÁ»ÑÁ, ÍÁÁÑ˼ÑÎ×Í ÒÈÍËÁÌÀÒÅÐÈÄ×ÍÁÒ¼
        
        
          ÐÎÑÓÅÉÁ [...] ÇÉÁ ÍÁ ÅÉÒÅ×ÖÓŽ Á×Ò¾ ÒÎ ÁÎÒ»ÌÅÑÁ»,
        
        
          32
        
        
          ËÁÉ Ñ×ÍÄ»ÎÍÒÁÉ Å «Ä»Î×ÑÁ
        
        
          ÅÉ»ÌÅÉÁ».
        
        
          33
        
        
          Å ÅнÒÔÑÈÎ× ÒÎ ËÐÒÎÕ ÅÉÄŽÊÅÉ Ä»Î×ÑÁ ÅÉ»ÌÅÉÁ, ÁÌÌ ÒÎÁÍÅÉÓÀ-
        
        
          ÈÒÎ ÁÎÒ»ÌÅÑÁ ÅÊÁËÎÌÎ×ÓŽ ÍÁ ÅÆÁͽØÅÒÁÉ, ÒÎ ËÐÒÎÕ ÄÅÍ »ÖÅÉ ÁÐÁÂŽ ×ÎÖлÔѼ
        
        
          28.
        
        
          
            Gab
          
        
        
          č
        
        
          
            Íkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia)
          
        
        
          , Judgment of 25 September 1997, I.C.J Reports
        
        
          1997, ÑÅÌ. 7, ÁÐÁ. 135-136;
        
        
          
            CertainQuestions of Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (Djibouti
          
        
        
          
            v. France)
          
        
        
          , Judgment of 4 June 2008, I.C.J. Reports 2008, ÑÅÌ. 177, ÁÐÁ. 104;
        
        
          
            Application of the
          
        
        
          
            Conventionon the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia andHerzegovina v.
          
        
        
          
            SerbiaandMontenegro)
          
        
        
          , Judgment of 26 February 2007, I.C.J. Reports 2007, ÑÅÌ. 43, ÁÐÁ. 430;
        
        
          
            Case
          
        
        
          
            concerning PulpMills on the river Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay)
          
        
        
          , Judgment of 20April 2010, I.C.J.
        
        
          Reports2010, ÑÅÌ. 14, ÁÐÁ. 185-187.
        
        
          29.  ÉÅÓÍ»Õ ÉËÁÑÒ¼ÐÉÎ ÒÈÕ ³ÇÈÕ:
        
        
          
            Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of
          
        
        
          
            theCrime of Genocide (BosniaandHerzegovina v. SerbiaandMontenegro)
          
        
        
          , Judgment of 26 February
        
        
          2007, I.C.J. Reports 2007, ÑÅÌ. 43, ÁÐÁ. 430. ÉÅÓÍ»Õ ÉËÁÑÒ¼ÐÉÎ ÇÉÁ ÒÎ ½ËÁÉÎ ÒÈÕ ÌÁÑÑÁÕ:
        
        
          
            Responsibilities andobligations of States sponsoringpersons and entitieswith respect toactivities in
          
        
        
          
            theArea (Request for AdvisoryOpinion submitted to the SeabedDisputes Chamber)
          
        
        
          , ITLOSCaseNo.
        
        
          17 (ITLOSSeabedDisputesChamber), 1February2011, ÁÐÁ. 110.
        
        
          30.  ÉÅÓÍ»Õ ÉËÁÑÒ¼ÐÉÎ ÒÈÕ ³ÇÈÕ:
        
        
          
            Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of
          
        
        
          
            theCrime of Genocide (BosniaandHerzegovina v. SerbiaandMontenegro)
          
        
        
          , Judgment of 26 February
        
        
          2007, I.C.J. Reports 2007, ÑÅÌ. 43, ÁÐÁ. 430. ÉÅÓÍ»Õ ÉËÁÑÒ¼ÐÉÎ ÇÉÁ ÒÎ ½ËÁÉÎ ÒÈÕ ÌÁÑÑÁÕ:
        
        
          
            Responsibilities andobligations of States sponsoringpersons and entitieswith respect toactivities in
          
        
        
          
            theArea (Request for AdvisoryOpinion submitted to the SeabedDisputes Chamber)
          
        
        
          , ITLOSCaseNo.
        
        
          17 (ITLOSSeabedDisputesChamber), 1February2011, ÁÐÁ. 110.
        
        
          31.
        
        
          
            CertainQuestions ofMutual Assistance inCriminalMatters (Djibouti v. France)
          
        
        
          , Judgment of 4 June
        
        
          2008, I.C.J. Reports2008, ÑÅÌ. 177, ÁÐÁ. 104.
        
        
          32.
        
        
          
            Responsibilities andobligations of States sponsoringpersons and entitieswith respect toactivities in
          
        
        
          
            theArea (Request for AdvisoryOpinion submitted to the SeabedDisputes Chamber)
          
        
        
          , ITLOSCaseNo.
        
        
          17 (ITLOSSeabedDisputesChamber), 1February2011, ÁÐÁ. 110.
        
        
          33.
        
        
          
            Case concerning PulpMills on the river Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay)
          
        
        
          , Judgment of 20April 2010,
        
        
          I.C.J. Reports 2010, ÑÅÌ. 14, ÁÐÁ. 187. ITLOS:
        
        
          
            Responsibilities and obligations of States sponsoring
          
        
        
          
            persons and entitieswith respect toactivities in theArea (Request for AdvisoryOpinion submitted to
          
        
        
          
            theSeabedDisputesChamber)
          
        
        
          , ITLOSCaseNo. 17 (ITLOSSeabedDisputesChamber), 1 February2011,
        
        
          ÁÐÁ. 110. ÉÁ×ÎÖÐÅÏÑÅÉÕ Ä»Î×ÑÁÕ ÅÉ»ÌÅÉÁÕ ÑÒÎ ÅÓÉÉ˾ĽËÁÉÎ, ÂÌ.:
        
        
          
            CorfuChannel Case
          
        
        
          , Judgment
        
        
          of 9 April 1949, I.C.J. Reports 1949, ÑÅÌ. 4, ÑÅÌ. 22-23.
        
        
          S. H
        
        
          EATHCOTE
        
        
          , State Omissions and Due
        
        
          Diligence: Aspects of Fault, Damage andContribution to Injury in the Law of State Responsibility, in
        
        
          K. B
        
        
          ANNELIER
        
        
          and
        
        
          T. C
        
        
          HRISTAKIS
        
        
          (eds.),
        
        
          
            The ICJ and the Evolutionof International Law: The Enduring
          
        
        
          
            Impact of the“CorfuChannel”Case
          
        
        
          , (London: Routledge, 2012), ÑÅÌ. 295-314;
        
        
          R. P
        
        
          ISILLO
        
        
          -
        
        
          M
        
        
          AZZESCHI
        
        
          ,
        
        
          TheDueDiligenceRuleand theNatureof International ResponsibilityofStates, 35
        
        
          
            GYIL
          
        
        
          (1992) 9-51.