ÉÅÓͼĽËÒ×Á ÅÍ»ÐÇÅÉÁÕ ËÁÉ ÐÔÒÎÇÅÍÅ½Õ Ñ×ÂÁÒÉË»Õ ×ÎÖÐÅÏÑÅÉÕ ËÐÁÒÏÍ
. ¡¤¡°¦¡
11
ÒÎ×. ¡¾ ÒÈÍÌÌÈÌÅ×Ð, ÁÍÅÊÐÒÈÒÁÁ¾ ÒÎÁÍÑ×ÂŽ ¼¾ÖÉ ÒÎÁÍÅÉÓÀÈÒÎÁÎÒ»ÌÅ-
ÑÁ,ÈÁÐÂÁÑÈ ÒÈÕ×ÎÖлÔѼÕÑ×ÍÒÅÌŽÒÁɾÍÎÁ¾ ÒÈÑ×ÅÐÉÆÎÐ ÒÎ×ËÐÒÎ×Õ.
34
¯É ×ÎÖÐÅÏÑÅÉÕ Ñ×ÅÐÉÆÎÐÕ Ñ×ÍÅÇÎÍÒÁÉ ÒÈÍ ×ÎÖлÔÑÈ ÒÎ× ËÐÒÎ×Õ ÍÁÓÅѽÑÅÉ
ÒÎ×Õ ËÁÒÌÌÈÌÎ×Õ ËÁ;ÍÅÕ ËÁÉ »ÒÐÁ, ËÁÓÏÕ ËÁÉ «»ÍÁÎÐÉÑ»ÍΠŽÅÄÎ ÒÈÕ ÅÁÇÐÀÍÈ-
ÑÈÕ ÑÒÈÍ ÅÆÁÐÎǼ ÒÎ×Õ ËÁÉ ÒÈÍ ÑËÈÑÈÄÉÎÉËÈÒÉËÎÀ ÅÌ»ÇÖÎ×Î× ÅÆÁоØÅÒÁÉ ÑÅ ÄÈ-
¾ÑÉÎ×Õ ËÁÉ ÉÄÉÔÒÉËÎÀÕ ÆÎÐŽջ.
35
Å ËÓÅ ÅнÒÔÑÈ, ÁÍ ÒÎ ËÐÒÎÕ Ñ×ÅÒ»ÖÅÉ ÅÍÅÐÇ
ÅÍÍÒÉÁÑÒÈÍ×ÎÖлÔÑÈÑ×ÅÐÉÆÎÐÕ, ÓÁÁÐÁ½ÁØÅ ÒÈÍ×ÎÖлÔѼ ÒÎ×.
36
¯É ×ÎÖÐÅÏÑÅÉÕ ÁÎÒÅÌ»ÑÁÒÎÕ ÁÐÁÂÉØÎÍÒÁÉ ¾ÒÁÍ ÒÎÁÎÒ»ÌÅÑÁÎ×ÁÁÉÒŽÒÁÉ Á¾
ÒÎ ÂÁÑÉ˾ ËÁ;ÍÁ ÄÅÍ ÎÐŽ ÍÁ ÅÉÒÅ×ÖÓŽ.
37
¯É ×ÎÖÐÅÏÑÅÉÕ Ñ×ÅÐÉÆÎÐÕ ÁÐÁÂÉ-
ØÎÍÒÁÉ ÒÈ ÑÒÉǼ ÒÈÕ ÅÆÍÉÑÈÕ ÒÈÕ ËÁÒÑÒÁÑÈÕ Î× ÁÁÇÎÐÅÀÅÒÁÉ Á¾ ÒÎÍ ËÁ;ÍÁ.
38
¡¾ ÒÈÍ ÌÌÈÌÅ×Ð, È ÒÁÊÉ;ÈÑÈÁ×Ò¼ÄÅÍ ÎÐŽ ÍÁ ŽÍÁÉ ÒξÍλÑÎ ÇÉÁ ÒÎÍ ËÁ-
ÓÎÐÉѾ ÒÎ×ÅÐÉÅÖλÍÎ× ÒÔÍ ×ÎÖÐÅÏÑÅÔÍ (ÅÄÏ, Î×ÁÆÎÐÎÀÍ ÑÒÈÄÉ»ÌÅ×ÑÈ), ÄɾÒÉ
ÎÉ ×ÎÖÐÅÏÑÅÉÕ ÑÅ ÄÉÁÆÎÐÅÒÉË»Õ Ñ×ÍÓ¼ËÅÕ ÄÉÁÆ»ÐÎ×Í, ËÁÉ È ÅÐÈÍŽÁ ËÓÅ ÐÔÒÎÇÅ-
ÍÎÀÕ ËÁ;ÍÁ ÊÅÖÔÐÉÑÒÁÐÁ»ÍÅÉ ÑÈÁÍÒÉ˼ ÇÉÁ ÒÎÍ ÐÎÑÄÉÎÐÉѾ ÒÎ×ÅÐÉÅÖλÍÎ×
ÒÈÕ ×ÎÖÐÅÏÑÅÔÕ. £½ÑÈÕ, ŽÍÁÉ Ä×ÍÁÒ¾ ÍÁ×ÐÖÎ×Í ×ÎÖÐÅÏÑÅÉÕ, Î×ÄÅÍ Å½ÍÁÉ ¾ÍÎ
Ñ×ÅÐÉÆÎÐÕ ¼ ¾ÍÎ ÁÎÒÅÌ»ÑÁÒÎÕ, ¼ ÎÐŽ ÍÁ ÁͼËÎ×Í ÑÅ ÉÁ ÄÉÁÆÎÐÅÒÉ˼ ËÁÒÈ-
ÇÎнÁ: ¾ÔÕ ‘obligations of performance’.
39
¥ÄÉËÐÉÑÈÄÅÍ Å½ÍÁÉ ÅÀËÎÌÈ, ÄɾÒÉ ÒÎ ËÁÒ
¾ÑÎÍ ×¼ÐÊÅ ÁÐÁ½ÁÑÈ ÅÊÁÐÒÒÁÉ Á¾ ÒÎ ÁËÐÉÂ»Õ ÅÐÉÅÖ¾ÅÍÎ ÅÍ¾Õ Ñ×ÇËÅËÐÉ»ÍÎ×
ÐÔÒÎÇÅÍÎÀÕ ËÁ;ÍÁ, ËÁÉ ÒÁÐÁÇÁÒÉËÅÐÉÑÒÁÒÉË ÒÈÕ ×¾ÓÅÑÈÕ. ¥ËÓÅ×ÎÖлÔÑÈ
ÑÒÎÌÁ½ÑÉÎÄÉÁÆÎÐÅÒÉË¼Õ Ñ×ÍÓ¼ËÈÕ Å½ÍÁÉ ÄÉÁÆÎÐÅÒÉ˼ËÁÉ Ð»ÅÉ ÍÁ ÅÐÈÍÅÀÅÒÁÉ ÊÅÖÔ-
34.
J. C
RAWFORD
,
State Responsibility: theGeneral Part
, (Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 2013)
ÑÅÌ. 230.
35.
Case concerning PulpMills on the river Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay)
, Judgment of 20April 2010,
I.C.J. Reports2010, ÑÅÌ. 14, ÁÐÁ. 195-197.
36.
Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia
andHerzegovina v. SerbiaandMontenegro)
, Judgment of 26 February 2007, I.C.J. Reports 2007, ÑÅÌ.
43, ÁÐÁ. 382.
37.
C.P. E
CONOMIDES
, Content of theObligations: Obligations ofMeans andObligations of Result, in
J.
C
RAWFORD
,
A. P
ELLET
and
S.O
LLESON
(eds.),
The Lawof International Responsibility
, (Oxford:Oxford
UniversityPress, 2010), ÑÅÌ. 371-381, 377.
38. Text of thedraft articles on responsibility of States for internationallywrongful actswith commentar-
ies thereto, Report of theCommission to theGeneral Assembly on thework of its fifty-third session,
YbILC2001-II, ÑÅÌ. 56, ÁÐÁ. 11.
39. ÒÈÍ ×¾ÓÅÑÈ
Gab
č
vkovo-Nagymaros
ÒÎÉÅÓÍ»Õ ÉËÁÑÒ¼ÐÉÎ ÒÈÕ ³ÇÈÕ ÁÍÁÇÍÏÐÉÑÅ ÒÈÍ ÀÁÐÊÈ ×Î-
ÖÐÅÏÑÅÔÍ Á¾ÄÎÑÈÕ (‘obligations of performance’) ËÁÉ ËÁÒ»ÒÁÊÅ ÁÍÅÑÁ ÑÅ Á×Ò»Õ ÒÉÕ ×ÎÖÐÅÏÑÅÉÕ
×ÎÖÐÅÏÑÅÉÕ ÇÉÁ ÒÈÍ ËÁÒÁÑËÅ×¼ÆÐÁÇÒÔÍ ÑÒÎÎÀÍÁÂÈ, ÑÀÆÔÍÁÅ ÒÈÄÉÅмÑׯÔͽÁ ÒÎ× 1977
ÅÒÁÊÀ ÒÔÍ ÅÐÏÍ ÒÈÕ ÄÉÁÆÎÐÕ (ÌÎÂÁ˽Á ËÁÉ ¯×ÇÇÁнÁ).
Gab
č
vkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/
Slovakia)
, Judgment of 25 September 1997, I.C.J Reports 1997, ÑÅÌ. 7, ÁÐÁ. 135-136. ¬ÑÒ¾ÑÎ, ÒÎ
ÉËÁÑÒ¼ÐÉÎ ÄÅÍ ÐÎÑÄɾÐÉÑÅ ÒÈÍ »ÍÍÎÉÁ ËÁÉ ÒÎ ÅÐÉÅÖ¾ÅÍÎ ÒÔÍ ×ÎÖÐÅÏÑÅÔÍ Á×ÒÏÍ (‘obligations of
performance’), ÎÀÒÅ ÅʼÇÈÑÅ ÒÉÕ ÍÎÉË»Õ Ñ×Í»ÅÉÅÕ ÉÁÕ Ò»ÒÎÉÁÕ ËÁÒÈÇÎнÁÕ ÇÉÁ ÒÈ ÄÉÅÓͼ Å×ÓÀÍÈ ÒÔÍ
ËÐÁÒÏÍ. ÉÁ ÒÎ̾ÇÎÁ×Ò¾, ÈÁÐÎÀÑÁÅÌ»ÒÈ ÅÉËÅÍÒÐÏÍÅÒÁÉ ÑÒÈÄÉËÐÉÑÈÅÒÁÊÀ ÒÔÍ×ÎÖÐÅÏÑÅÔÍÑ×-
ÅÐÉÆÎÐÕ ËÁÉ ÁÎÒÅÌ»ÑÁÒÎÕ. ¥ »ÍÍÎÉÁ ‘obligationof performance’ ÖÐÈÑÉÎÎÉŽÒÁÉ Á¾ ÒÎÍ Kelsen
ÔÕ ×ÎÖлÔÑÈ ËÎÉÎ× ÍÁ ÅÍÅÐǼÑÅÉ, ÑÅ ÁÍÒ½ÓÅÑÈ Å ÒÈÍ ×ÎÖлÔÑÈ ËÎÉÎ× ÍÁ ÁÍÅÖÓŽ ÒÈ Ñ×Å-
ÐÉÆÎÐ ÌÌÎ×:
H. K
ELSEN
,
Pure Theory of Law
, (translated from the 2nd ed. byM. Knight) (Berkeley:
UniversityofCaliforniaPress, 1967), ÑÅÌ.126.