ΔΙΕΘΝΗΣ ΕΜΠΟΡΙΚΗ ΔΙΑΙΤΗΣΙΑ ΚΑΙ ΕΦΑΡΜΟΓΗ ΤΩΝ ΚΑΝΟΝΩΝ ΑΝΤΑΓΩΝΙΣΜΟΥ

122 ¨ňńŇŌņő ńŋŏŎŐňŉņ ¨ňŁňŒņőňŁ ŉŁň ńŔŁŐŋŎŃņ ŒŌ ŉŁŌŎŌŌ ŁŌŒŁŃŌňőŋŎœ

ŞŦůŤůŦŧŹũ ŞūűřŮŢŴũ ŞūůŢŨŢŜ ťŢŢŨŦŹšŤ ŞŬŲś ůūŰ šŦŧŞŜūŰ ůŤŭ šŦŞŦůŤ-

ŮŜŞŭ ŧŞŦ ŧŞťūŬŦŮůŦŧŷ ŞŬřŠūũůŞ šŦŞŮűřŨŦŮŤŭ ůŤŭ ŮŰŮůŤŦŧśŭ ŞŧŢŬŞŦŷ-

ůŤůŞŭ ůŤŭ šŦŞŦůŤůŦŧśŭ šŦŞšŦŧŞŮŜŞŭ. ŉřůŦ ůŚůūŦū űŞŜũŢůŞŦ ũŞ ŞũŞŠũŴŬŜţŢůŞŦ

Şŷ ůŤ ŮŧŚųŤ ůūŰ ¨ŦŧŞŮůŤŬŜūŰ ŷůŦ «

ť şŬŰţũţůşŰŧŨŸŰťŰş ŰťŮ ŢŧşŧŰťŰŧŨŜŮ

ŢŧşŢŧŨşůŝşŮ ŭŬŷŬŦśŰţŧ ŸŰŧ Ŭ ŬűůŧşůŰŧŨŸ śũţšųŬŮ ŨşŰŚ ŰŬ ůŰŚŢŧŬ ţŨŰśũţ-

ůťŮ ŰťŮ ŢŧşŧŰťŰŧŨŜŮ şŸŲşůťŮ şŭşśŪţŧ ţũŚųŧůŰŬŮ

390

. ŭ Ŭūŭ ůū ŧŞŜ-

ŬŦū ŢŬŹůŤŞ ůŤŭ ŢŬŤũŢŰůŦŧśŭ ŬūŮŚŠŠŦŮŤŭ ůūŰ ŷŬūŰ ‘ŢŨřŲŦŮůūŭ ūŰŮŦŞ-

ŮůŦŧŷŭ ŚŨŢŠŲūŭ’ (‘minimal substantive review’), ůū ¨ŦŧŞŮůśŬŦū ŬūŮŚűŢŬŢ

ŜŞ ŞűŜşūŨŤŭ ŲŬŤŮŦŷůŤůŞŭ ŧŞůŢŸťŰũŮŤ ŮŤŢŦŹũūũůŞŭ ŷůŦ «

Ŭ ţũŚųŧůŰŬŮ

śũţšųŬŮ ŰťŮ ŬűůŝşŮ ŰŵŪ ŢŧşŧŰťŰŧŨźŪ şŬŲŚůţŵŪ ţŝ ŢŧşŲŬŭźŪ şŪŰşšŵŪŧ-

ůŬŹ ŢţŪ şşŧŰţŝ ţŪŢţũţųŜ ţŬŰţŝş ŰŬűŮ

» ŧŞŦ ŢŬŦūŬŜţŢůŞŦ ŮůŤ šŦřŠũŴŮŤ

ůūŰ Ţřũ ŧŞŦ ŧŞůř ŷŮū «

ŰŬ ŢŧşŧŰťŰŧŨŸ ŢŧŨşůŰŜŭŧŬ śũşŠţ šŪźůť ŰŵŪ şūŧźůţ-

ŵŪ ţŭŝ şŪŰşšŵŪŧůŬŹ Ũşŧ şţŲŚŪŦť ŭŚšşŰŧ ţŝ şűŰźŪ

391

27. ŏŚŬŞ Şŷ ůū Ŵŭ řũŴ ŞűŦŨŢŠŷŢũū ţśůŤŞ, ůū ūūŜū ŞũŞŨŸŢůŞŦ ŮŢ

ŢŷŢũū ŧŢűřŨŞŦū, ŧŞŦ Űŷ ůū űŴŭ ůŤŭ ŮŰũūŨŦŧř ŮŰũŢūŸŭ ŢŦŲŢŦŬŤŞ-

ůūŨūŠŜŞŭ ůūŰ ¨ŦŧŞŮůŤŬŜūŰ, ŞšŸũŞůū ŮŤŢŜū ůŤŭ ůŢŨŦŧśŭ ůūŰ ťŚŮŤŭ Şū-

ůŢŨŢŜ ůū ŷůŦ ŬūŶūťŚůŢŦ ůŤũ Ţũůŷŭ ůŴũ ņ.ŏ.Ł. ŢŧůŚŨŢŮŤ ůŴũ ūŦŧŢŜŴũ šŦ-

ŞŦůŤůŦŧŹũ ŞūűřŮŢŴũ, ŨŞşřũŢŦ šŤŨŞšś Ŵŭ šŢšūŚũŤ ůŤũ řŮŧŤŮŤ ŧŞůŞ-

ŮůŞŨůŦŧūŸ ūŨŦůŢŦŞŧūŸ ŢŨŚŠŲūŰ Şŷ ůŞ ŁŢŬŦŧŞũŦŧř šŦŧŞŮůśŬŦŞ. ńũůūŸ-

ůūŦŭ, ŚŬŞ Şŷ ůŦŭ ŢŬŦůŹŮŢŦŭ ūŦŧŢŦūťŢŨūŸŭ ŢŧůŚŨŢŮŤŭ ůŴũ šŦŞŦůŤůŦŧŹũ

ŞūűřŮŢŴũ ŲŴŬŜŭ ŬūŮűŰŠś ŮůŤ ůŞŧůŦŧś šŦŧŞŦūŮŸũŤ, Ţřũ ū ŤůůŤŚũūŭ

ŮůŤ šŦŞŦůŤŮŜŞ šŦřšŦŧūŭ šŬŞŮůŤŬŦūūŦŢŜůŞŦ ŢŦŲŢŦŬŤŞůŦŧř ś ŧŞůŚŲŢŦ ŢŬŦ-

ūŰŮŦŞŧř ŮůūŦŲŢŜŞ ŮŢ ůŬŜůŤ ŲŹŬŞ, Ť šŦŞŦůŤůŦŧś ŞŷűŞŮŤ ŢũšŚŲŢůŞŦ ũŞ ŢŧůŢ-

ŨŢŮůŢŜ ŢŧŢŜ ŲŴŬŜŭ ũŞ šūťŢŜ ŬūŤŠūŰŚũŴŭ Ť šŰũŞůŷůŤůŞ ŮůŞ ŁŢŬŦŧŞũŦŧř

ůŞŧůŦŧř šŦŧŞŮůśŬŦŞ ũŞ šŦŞŮűŞŨŜŮūŰũ ůŤũ ŬūŮůŞŮŜŞ ůūŰ šŤŷŮŦūŰ ŮŰűŚ-

390. łŨ.

Mitsubishi v. Soler

, 105

S.Ct.

3346 (1985), ŮůŤ ŮŢŨ. 3360 (“

the efÀcacy of

the arbitral process requires that substantive review at the award-enforcement

stage remain minimal

…”).

391. łŨ.

Mitsubishi v. Soler

, 105

S.Ct.

3346 (1985), ŮůŤ ŮŢŨ. 3360 (“

a minimal merits

review of antitrust arbitral awards would not require intrusive inquiry, but it

would be limited to ascertaining whether the tribunal took cognizance of the

antitrust claims and actually decided them

”). łŨ.ŢŜŮŤŭ T. Carbonneau,

Mitsubi-

shi: the folly of quixotic internationalism

, 2(2) ArbInt, 1986, ŮŢŨ. 116-139, ŮůŦŭ

ŮŢŨ. 127-128, ŷūŰ ŰūŮůŤŬŜţŢůŞŦ ŷůŦ: “

It seems that the court is contemplating

nothing more than a mechanical, pro forma inspection of the surface content of

awards – a very far cry indeed from a judicial consideration of the merits

”, ŧŞŦ

W.Park,

National Law and Commercial Justice; Safeguarding Procedural Integrity

in International Arbitration

, 63 TLR, 1989, ŮŢŨ. 648 Ţ., ŮůŤ ŮŢŨ. 669, ŷūŰ ŮŤ-

ŢŦŹũŢůŞŦ ŷůŦ: “

It is uncertain if the second look involves a broad examination

of whether the arbitrator properly applied the law, or merely involves a me-

chanical examination of whether the arbitrator in fact considered the American

statute

”.